· Private foundation
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization Mission or Significant ActivitiesJewish Home of Cincinnati, Inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $264k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $479k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jewish Family Services | $242,302 |
| Jewish Community Center of Cincinna | $157,000 |
| Amberley Village Police Department | $80,000 |
| Nancy and David Wolf Holocaust Cent | $36,000 |
| Rockdale Temple | $35,000 |
| Jewish Education for Every Person | $31,000 |
| Jewish Family Services | $30,000 |
| Klau Library | $30,000 |
| Jewish Federation of Cincinnati | $25,000 |
| Golf Manor Synagogue | $20,000 |
| Cincinnati Community Kollel | $20,000 |
| ISH Festival | $17,000 |
| Rockwern Academy | $10,000 |
| Isaac M Wise Temple | $10,000 |
| Skirball Museum | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $518k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $487k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati3× · 2022–2024 · $340k · revenue +42%
- TCThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education3× · 2022–2024 · $83k · revenue +937%
- YDYavneh Day School Association3× · 2022–2024 · $31k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- JFJewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Areaone grant, 2023 · $241k · revenue +5%
- JFJewish Federation of Cintione grant, 2021 · $135k
- SHStarPoint Home Careone grant, 2019 · $88k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…
Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. serves the burial needs of the Greater Cincinnati Jewish community with care and dignity and honors the resting places of our people.
Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.
The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…
Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.
Make Jewish life vibrant, safe, and accessible in Columbus, Israel, and around the world.
The jewish federation of greater dayton is the central organization established to further the welfare of the jewish community. the federation coordinates social, welfare and cultural programs; fosters cooperation among jewish…
To empower individuals, strengthen families, protect the vulnerable and help seniors age with dignity. Our work is based on Jewish values to improve quality of life regardless of race, religion, ethnic background, sexual orientation, or…
The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland builds, connects and strengthens our Jewish and Greater Cleveland communities through exceptional lifelong programs and services that reflect the richness of Jewish life and enhance physical,…
The Jewish Council on Urban Affair's (JCUA) longstanding mission is to combat poverty, racism and antisemitism working in partnership with diverse communities. JCUA uses a community organizing model to engage the Jewish community in the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Yavneh Day School Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds Jewish Education for Every Person ↗
- Who funds The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education ↗
- Who funds Yavneh Day School Association ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds ISH FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds HALOM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FJC ↗
- Who funds Cancer Family Care Inc ↗
- Who funds The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc ↗
- Who funds Pro Seniors Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cincinnati · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.