Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fort Worth Cops for Kids Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2019
12
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Human Services$16kYouth Development$16kHealth$14kRecreation & Sports$11kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$9kReligion$4kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$550
Median grant
2
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIRECTLY PAID DESIGNATIONS$4,296
COOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500
CONVOY OF HOPE$1,000
BELIEVERS TABERNACLE CHURCH$700
DIAMOND HILL-JARVIS ATHLETICS BOOSTER CLUB$555
BRIGHTER OUTLOOK INC$550
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CHURCH AT PHILADELPHIA$500
HEAVENLY TOUCHED COMMUNITY CENTER$500
Individual grant recipient$500
BOULEVARD HEIGHTS AND TRANSITION CENTER$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIGHTER OUTLOOK INC: $1k → 11%BRIGHTER OUTLOOK INC: $550 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 9 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$53k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+52%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Youth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsCivil RightsHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +18%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +88%
  • BO
    Brighter Outlook Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +311%

Funded once

  • FW
    FORT WORTH VAQUEROS SOCCER TEAM
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • R2
    Read 2 Win
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -19%
  • FW
    Fort Worth Airpower Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +222%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe City Commission

Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.

Crime & Legal
2
Fort Worth Cops for Kids Inc
Youth Development
3
Education Foundation for Fort Worth Schools

The mission of the Education Foundation for Fort Worth Schools is to raise and manage funds and engage business and community partners to provide opportunities for students to become successful adults in our communities.

—
4
Camp Fire Central Texas

Camp Fire Central Texas builds caring, confident youth and future leaders through hands-on science, outdoor experiences, and service to the community.

—
5
Prevent Blindness Texas

to prevent blindness and preserve sight through education, certified vision screening and training, advocacy, research and community and patient service programs

—
6
Northwest Texas Council of Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. The aims of the Boy Scouts of America is to promote character…

—
7
Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce

To act as the voice of business, articulating a business perspective and advocating policies supported by the fort worth general business community.

—
8
The Texas Conference for Women

Cfw inspires and empowers the nation's leading employers, teams, and individuals to reach their full potential at work and in life.

Human Services
9
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
10
Read Fort Worth

The mission of read fort worth is to ensure that all students in the city of fort worth, texas read on grade level by third grade. they believe that this will equip the students on the path to success in school and in life. the officers…

—
11
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
12
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIRECTLY PAID DESIGNATIONS: $12,946 · OtherDIRECTLY PAID DESIGNATIONSCOOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $12,800 · OtherCOOK CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONPURPOSE DRIVEN YOUTH EMPOWERMENT: $9,000 · OtherPURPOSE DRIVEN YOUTH EMPOWERMENTFORT WORTH VAQUEROS SOCCER TEAM: $5,500 · OtherFORT WORTH VAQUEROS SOCCER TEAMHEAVENLY TOUCHED COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,500 · OtherHEAVENLY TOUCHED COMMUNITY CENTERDEFY: $4,500 · OtherDEFYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $3,000 · OtherBELIEVERS TABERNACLE CHURCH: $2,800 · OtherNORTH CROWLEY HIGH SCHOOL: $2,500 · Other+16 more: $15,855 · Other+16 moreCONVOY OF HOPE: $8,000 · InternationalRead 2 Win: $5,000 · EducationFIAFW INC: $1,200 · EducationCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentFort Worth Airpower Foundation: $5,000 · Public BenefitSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$74,401International$8,000Education$6,200Youth Development$5,500Public Benefit$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRead 2 Win: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast Fort Worth Business Association: $500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Read 2 Win ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Fort Worth Airpower Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Brighter Outlook Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIAFW INC ↗
  • Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS GAME WARDEN ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds East Fort Worth Business Association ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sid W Richardson FoundationTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sid W Richardson Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · R David and Sherri M Jones Foundation · Fort Worth Colonial Charities Inc (Fka Bfc Colonial Inc) · The Morris Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fort Worth Cops for Kids Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fort Worth Cops for Kids Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fort Worth Cops for Kids’ filings →

    More from the funding graph