· Private foundation
Forest Creatures Foundation Ltd
THE MISSION OF THE FOREST CREATURES FOUNDATION IS TO BUILD AN ENDURING LEGACY OF PEACE, COEXISTENCE, AND COMMUNITY THROUGH THE USE OF FILM, TELEVISION, NEW MEDIA, THE DRAMATIC ARTS, AND OTHER RELATED DISCIPLINES OF THE ARTS.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $945k
- $250k+2 grants · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS | $500,000 |
| WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND | $250,000 |
| EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE INC | $140,000 |
| HOPEWELL FUND | $125,000 |
| VOTE FORWARD | $125,000 |
| URBAN TILTH | $85,000 |
| MOVEMENT GENERATION | $75,000 |
| CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY | $75,000 |
| OCEAN AWARENESS PROJEC INC | $70,000 |
| NEW ROOTS INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC | $50,000 |
| NATUREBRIDGE | $50,000 |
| BAVC | $50,000 |
| JOLT INITIATIVE | $50,000 |
| TUOLUMNE RIVER TRUST | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $590k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Earth Island Institute Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $180k · revenue +35%- NRNew Roots Institute2× · 2024–2025 · $75k · revenue +29%
- NNATUREBRIDGE3× · 2023–2025 · $73k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $30k
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +10%
- PPPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Incone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.
Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…
To mobilize people in local communities around the world to protect marine wildlife and the oceans and inland watersheds that sustain them.
To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…
Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urban Tilth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS ↗
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds VOTE FORWARD ↗
- Who funds OCEAN AWARENESS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Tilth ↗
- Who funds Movement Generation ↗
- Who funds New Roots Institute ↗
- Who funds NATUREBRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance ↗
- Who funds FLATBUSH CATS INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds JOLT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ARCADIA FOOD INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds FARMLINK PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Baykeeper ↗
- Who funds SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds UC PRESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds City Surf Project ↗
- Who funds COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL OCEAN FILM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Conservation ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Patagoniaorg · East Bay Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Windward Fund · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Forest Creatures Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Forest Creatures Foundation Ltd?
Find your warmest path to Forest Creatures Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.