Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foreign Mission Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$806k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$466k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$3.7MPhilanthropy$2.1MAnimals$701kEmployment$389kYouth Development$357kHuman Services$151kEducation$86kInternational$77kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $184k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $116k
  • $250k+1 grant · $466k
$12,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ETANI$465,514
Arise and Shine Society$62,463
New Creation Charitable Society$53,145
Cedar Creek Freedom Center$40,581
Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust$38,500
Trinity Mission Trust$33,991
Father's House City Ministries$26,745
Spread the Fire Ministries$20,600
TACDP-The Asian Christian Devl$12,000
Student Church Movement$12,000
Global Banjara Foundation Trust$7,326
Christian Research$7,220
Focus India Missions$7,000
Behala Human Care Mission$6,300
Alpha USA$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 10% of grant dollars ($823k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 90% that went abroad ($7.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%California Baptist University: $17k → 11%Biola University: $7k → 14%YWAM: $7k → 15%Rhema for the Nations: $5k → 11%LeTourneau University: $5k → 16%Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $356k → 9%Harvest Church: $21k → 17%Student Church Movement: $14k → 15%Christian Research: $7k → 8%Father's House City Ministries: $94k → 12%Solomon's Porch Ministries: $35k → 14%India Partners: $5k → 15%Alpha USA: $7k → 7%Spread the Fire Ministries: $21k → 8%California Baptist University: $11k → 11%Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $205k → 9%Student Church Movement: $12k → 15%Christian Research: $6k → 8%Father's House City Ministries: $84k → 12%Solomon's Porch Ministries: $11k → 14%Kingdom Movement: $5k → 9%Alpha USA: $6k → 7%Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $173k → 9%Student Church Movement: $12k → 15%CEF of Oregon: $14k → 8%Father's House City Ministries: $28k → 12%Alpha USA: $5k → 7%Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $134k → 9%Student Church Movement: $12k → 15%CEF of Oregon: $12k → 8%Father's House City Ministries: $27k → 12%Alpha USA: $5k → 7%Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $72k → 9%Student Church Movement: $12k → 15%CEF of Oregon: $12k → 8%Father's House City Ministries: $27k → 12%Alpha USA: $4k → 7%Badavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $39k → 9%Student Church Movement: $12k → 15%CEF of Oregon: $11k → 8%Father's House City Ministries: $21k → 12%Solomon's Porch Ministries: $47k → 8%Cedar Creek Freedom Center: $41k → 8%Cedar Creek Ministries: $25k → 8%Solomon's Porch Ministries: $10k → 8%Cedar Creek Ministries: $10k → 8%Cedar Creek Ministries: $5k → 8%Cedar Creek Ministries: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
TN
SC
HI
AL
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 90% of all-years giving ($7.2M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$7.2M · 69 grants
United Kingdom$71k · 6 grants
Thailand$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Foreign Mission Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 7% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 5%.

Foreign Mission Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 59% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 31 repeat orgs$388k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
38

Total granted

$7.7M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+37%

Still filing today

16%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    Alpha USA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +145%
  • CB
    CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $28k · revenue +24%
  • IP
    India Partners
    3× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SG
    Shalom Global Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • VI
    Vision India
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • LM
    Logos Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
5
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
6
Instituto De Estudios Teologicos

Conference

Education
7
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
8
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
9
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
10
Trinity International University

Trinity international university is an institution of higher education that offers both undergraduate and postgraduate degree programs. trinity international university educates men and women for faithful participation in god's redemptive…

Education
11
Trinity Western University

Trinity Western University's mission is to produce positive, goal-oriented graduates with thoroughly Christian minds-growing disciples of Jesus Christ who glorify God through fulfilling the Great Commission, serving God and people in…

Education
12
Explore God Network
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Word for the Nations Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tijeras Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ETANI: $2,969,960 · OtherETANIAbhaya Charitable Truth Society: $1,048,591 · OtherAbhaya Charitable Truth SocietyBadavo Banjara Phozear Trust: $978,050 · OtherBadavo Banjara Phozear TrustIndividual grant recipient: $724,322 · OtherIndividual grant recipientArise and Shine Society: $420,188 · OtherTrinity Mission Trust: $284,176 · OtherFather's House City Ministries: $280,575 · Other+54 more: $1,190,380 · Other+54 moreSTUDENT CHURCHES: $74,250 · ReligionAlpha USA: $31,230 · ReligionRHEMA FOR THE NATIONS: $5,000 · Religion+3 more: $4,700 · ReligionCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $27,995 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $6,517 · EducationLeTourneau University: $4,552 · EducationGrand Canyon University: $4,094 · EducationIndia Partners: $6,412 · InternationalWindow International Network: $1,500 · InternationalGlobal Generosity Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTIJERAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$7,896,242Religion$115,180Education$43,158International$7,912Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTUDENT CHURCHES: $74,250 over 6y, 13% of budgetAlpha USA: $31,230 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $27,995 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $6,517 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndia Partners: $6,412 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY: $5,728 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHEMA FOR THE NATIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLeTourneau University: $4,552 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $4,094 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S WORD FOR THE NATIONS INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWindow International Network: $1,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGlobal Generosity Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIJERAS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSANCTUARY INN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STUDENT CHURCHES ↗
  • Who funds Alpha USA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds India Partners ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foreign Mission Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foreign Mission Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foreign Mission’s filings →

    More from the funding graph