Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foraker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$57kEducation$9kPublic Benefit$7kPhilanthropy$4kHealth$3kHuman Services$1kCivil Rights$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$113k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRESNO STATE BULLDOG FOUNDATION$8,000
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$1,000
PARKINSON FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
TURNING POINT USA$500
JUDICIAL WATCH$500
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$500
EXERCISE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$500
MAYO CLINIC$500
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$500
APDA (PARKINSON ASSOCIATION)$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FORWARD STRIDE: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
OR
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 12 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$76k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+7%

Still filing today

42%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BULLDOG FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +10%
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +50%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • FS
    FRESNO STATE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CC
    Cabrillo College Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Institute for State Effectiveness

The institute for state effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through…

International
9
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty

The mission of the acton institute is to promote a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship & Political Philosophy; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BULLDOG FOUNDATION: $64,072 · EducationTHE BULLDOG FOUNDATIONUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationCabrillo College Foundation: $2,500 · Education+3 more: $1,825 · EducationFRESNO STATE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherFRESNO STATE FOUNDA…Individual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…CALIFORNIA REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTERS: $1,617 · OtherCALIFORNIA REGIONAL…Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…Institute for Humane Studies: $1,000 · OtherInstitute for Human…Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…THE SALVATION ARMY: $950 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $700 · OtherFRESNO STATE RUGBY CLUB: $650 · Other+17 more: $4,290 · Other+17 moreLeadership Institute: $3,850 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,300 · Public BenefitPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $3,650 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $700 · HealthEXERCISE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $500 · Health+2 more: $200 · HealthHERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CultureFORWARD STRIDE: $100 · Human Services
Education$71,397Other$17,707Public Benefit$7,150Health$5,050Arts & Culture$500Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BULLDOG FOUNDATION: $64,072 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Institute: $3,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $3,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCabrillo College Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXERCISE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD STRIDE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BULLDOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cabrillo College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EXERCISE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD STRIDE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foraker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foraker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foraker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph