Skip to content

· Private foundation

For the Environment Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$79kEnvironment$46kHuman Services$11kCivil Rights$10kEducation$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kScience & Tech$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,957
Median grant
9
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wildlife Conservation Network$2,052
Carolina Tiger rescue$2,052
Thin Green Line Born Free USA$2,001
Individual grant recipient$2,000
The Pachama Alliance$1,987
Southeast Alaska Consevation Council$1,967
Native American Rights Fund$1,957
African Wildlife Foundation$1,957
Los Probres Inc$1,900
Borneo Sun Bear Conseravation$1,900
Sea Turtle Conservancy$1,900
Great Bear Foundation$1,900
Chesapeake Bay Environmental Center$943
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Los Pobres Inc: $3k → 15%Los Pobres Inc: $2k → 15%LOS POBRES INC: $2k → 15%LOS POBRES INC: $2k → 15%LOS POBRES INC: $2k → 15%LOS POBRES INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
NY
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$155k · 19 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$155k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+226%

Still filing today

47%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $943 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesScience & TechCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +56%
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • TP
    The Pachamama Alliance
    6× · 2017–2022 · $14k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK SAVE THE ELEPHANTS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • UP
    UNIDOS POR PUERTO RICO
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +226%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
4
International Conservation Caucus Network

To advance conservation governance through political will and to provide "on the ground" solutions to ensure sustained economic benefits while managing the earth's natural resource wealth for future generations.

Unclassified
5
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
6
Galapagos Whale Shark Project
—
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
9
Fundacion Cordillera Tropical

Conservation of natural resources

International
10
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
11
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
12
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Los Pobres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREAT BEAR FOUNDATION: $16,250 · OtherGREAT BEAR FOUNDATIONThin Green Line Born Free USA: $14,893 · OtherThin Green Line Born Free USAIndividual grant recipient: $10,453 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSURVIVAL OF THE SUN BEARS: $6,749 · OtherSURVIVAL OF THE SUN BEARSNative American Rights: $4,560 · OtherNative American RightsBornean Sun Bear Conservation: $4,541 · OtherBornean Sun Bear ConservationIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Pachama Alliance: $3,974 · OtherBorneo Sun Bear Conseravation: $3,800 · OtherLos Probres Inc: $3,800 · OtherFRIENDS OF WOLF CREEK: $3,000 · Other+4 more: $4,033 · OtherSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC: $14,993 · EnvironmentSoutheast Alaska Conse…The Pachamama Alliance: $14,350 · EnvironmentThe Pachamama Alliance+3 more: $2,000 · Environment+3 moreAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,307 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILD…CAROLINA TIGER RESCUE: $4,028 · AnimalsCAROLINA TIG…WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $3,952 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CON…Sea Turtle Conservancy: $14,750 · InternationalSea Turtle…LOS POBRES: $10,950 · Human ServicesNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $4,966 · Civil RightsLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $500 · Science & Tech
Other$80,553Environment$31,343Animals$18,287International$14,750Human Services$10,950Civil Rights$4,966Science & Tech$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT BEAR FOUNDATION: $16,250 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetSoutheast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC: $14,993 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSea Turtle Conservancy: $14,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $14,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS POBRES: $10,950 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $10,307 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $4,966 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA TIGER RESCUE: $4,028 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $3,952 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT BEAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-SEACC ↗
  • Who funds Sea Turtle Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds The Pachamama Alliance ↗
  • Who funds LOS POBRES ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA TIGER RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN SHORE LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization For the Environment Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from For the Environment Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Eastern Shore Land Conservancy Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to For the Environment Inc?

Find your warmest path to For the Environment Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on For the Environment’s filings →

More from the funding graph