Skip to content
Foodcorps Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Foodcorps Inc

Together with communities, foodcorps serves to connect kids to healthy food in schools.

$61k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Food & Nutrition$208kEnvironment$25kEducation$17kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$60,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION$60,000
ROOTED IN LOVE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROOTED IN LOVE INC: $1k → 13%URBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
AZ
NM
NC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yuba River Charter School

Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…

Education
2
Atlanta Neighborhood Charter School

The mission of the atlanta neighborhood charter school (ancs) is to use the principles of the coalition of essential schools to: build an empowered and inclusive community of students,parents, and educators; engage the whole…

Education
3
Redwood Cooperative School

Education Preschool Through Eight Grade

Education
4
Cornerstone Community School Association

We are reimagining elementary education to cultivate equity and inspire the next generation of innovators through project-based learning. By creating hands-on projcets to solve tangible, community-focused problems, the students will…

Education
5
Burien Cooperative Education Project

The Bridge School is a cooperative, multi-age, progressive elementary school program that fosters authentic learning through whole child development.

—
6
Rooted School Foundation

Rooted School Foundation exists to reimagine the role schools play in providing students with personal pathways to financial freedom and then scaling those opportunities.

Education
7
Growe Foundation

Garden to table empowers school communities with gardens and curriculum to engage all students in experiential outdoor education.

Youth Development
8
Urban Discovery Schools

Urban discovery academy develops design thinkers who lead by example, making active, positive contributions to their local and global communities.

Education
9
GreenWood Charter School

Our mission is to provide a quality holistic education to all students.

Education
10
Rooted

To dramatically increase the number of dps students attending schools that partner authentically with communities to deliver a high quality education for all.

Education
11
Pikes Peak School of Expeditionary Learning

Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.

Education
12
Soar Charter School

Soar charter school was founded in 2010 and is built on the premise that we should "expect more" from our public schools. soar students create full and meaningful lives, enrich our democracy, and contribute to a more just society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban School Food Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rooted in Love Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 · OtherGROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES I…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORWALK PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 · OtherNORWALK PUBLIC SCHOOLSOREGON FARM TO SCHOOL AND SCHOOL GARDEN NETWORK: $10,000 · OtherOREGON FARM TO SCHOOL AND SCHOOL GARDEN NETWO…RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $5,000 · OtherCEDARVILLE SCHOOL: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $23,000 · Other+9 moreURBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesURBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE INC+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER G…DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6,665 · EducationSalida Montessori Charter School: $3,000 · EducationNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3,000 · EducationURBAN PRAIRIE: $3,000 · Education
Other$103,000Human Services$76,000Youth Development$60,000Education$15,665

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetURBAN SCHOOL FOOD ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROUNDWORK CENTER FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $6,665 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN PRAIRIE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROOTED IN LOVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foodcorps Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foodcorps Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Alliance for a Healthier Generation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foodcorps’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home