· Public charity
Food Bank of Alaska
FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bethel Community Services | $551,127 |
| Southeast Alaska Food Bank | $398,635 |
| Upper Susitna Food Pantry | $307,585 |
| Native Vill of Unalakleet | $197,512 |
| Valdez Food Bank | $189,450 |
| Armed Services YMCA | $150,778 |
| Lutheran Social Services | $132,701 |
| Tlingit & Haida Indian Tri | $100,000 |
| Catholic Social Services | $90,840 |
| Kenai Peninsula Food Bank | $74,389 |
| Native Village of Tetlin | $55,221 |
| Maniilaq Association | $54,990 |
| Brother Francis of Kodiak | $51,420 |
| Hoonah Indian Association | $38,395 |
| MatSu Senior Services | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $740k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $695k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KPKENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC5× · 2021–2025 · $693k · revenue +3%
- SASOUTHEAST ALASKA FOOD BANK5× · 2021–2025 · $604k · revenue +301%
- FCFAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $417k · revenue +248%
Funded once
- BCBeans Cafe Incone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue +21%
- CRCopper River Native Association Incone grant, 2024 · $116k · revenue 0%
- EAECO A CONVENANT ORDER OF EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIANSone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.
Unalaska senior citizens is committed to providing nutrition, transportation, information and support services that promote the health and well-being of our elders and to assist them in living independently and remaining active, vital…
To provide assisted living services to elderly native Americans living in Dillingham, Alaska. In 2020, MEAL discontinued operating as an assisted living facility and started leasing its space to Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation (BBAHC)…
to provide for the welfare of senior citizens residing in Haines, Alaska
To expand and preserve year-round rental opportunities that are affordable to moderate, low, and very low-income households to foster a welcoming environment for demographically and socio-economically diverse populations in Anchorage, AK.
To operate a nutrition, Transportation program for elders, providing meals, rides and personal advocacy, also provide space to Head Start program operated by Rural Cap. Our goal is to provide economic, social and educational development…
Provide temporary shelter for the homeless of ketchikan ak. the shelter serves as a temporary place for shelter, not a permanent residence. served appoximately 200 individuals.
To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need
Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wasilla Area Seniors Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kids Kupboard. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ALASKA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BETHEL COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER SUSITNA FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds Emergency Assistance and Food Bank of Valdez ↗
- Who funds Brother Francis Shelter Kodiak ↗
- Who funds Beans Cafe Inc ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ALASKA ↗
- Who funds Copper River Native Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Kids Kupboard ↗
- Who funds Catholic Social Services ↗
- Who funds CHUGIAK EAGLE RIVER FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Mat-Su Food Bank ↗
- Who funds KAWERAK INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD N FIRE MINISTRY OF ALASKA ↗
- Who funds Maniilaq Association ↗
- Who funds HOMER COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds NENANA TORTELLA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds PALMER SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE MISSION ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU HOUSING FIRST COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds Upper Susitna Seniors Inc ↗
- Who funds NOME COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Wasilla Area Seniors Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · The Kroger Co Foundation · Rural Alaska Community Action Program · The Carr Foundation Inc · Global Credit Union Foundation · Providence Alaska Foundation · United Way of Anchorage · Mta Foundation Inc · Alaska Children's Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Food Bank of Alaska funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.