Skip to content
Floyd County Legacy Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Floyd County Legacy Foundation Inc

To provide endowed funds as a resource to help meet community needs today and provide for those changing needs for the future generations by encouraging philanthropic leadership and flexible charitable opportunities.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$2.5MRecreation & Sports$365kHuman Services$358kHealth$309kEmployment$175kYouth Development$153kFood & Nutrition$115kReligion$110kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLOYD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS$1,180,000
BRANDON'S HOUSE COUNSELING CENTER INC$25,000
PERSONAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC$25,000
CASA OF FLOYD COUNTY$25,000
RAUCH INC$20,000
JACOBS WELL INC$20,000
FRIENDS OF OPEN DOOR YOUTH SERVICES$15,000
CHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTER INC$15,000
SILVER HEIGHTS CAMP AND RETREAT CENTER$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK AND FLOYD INDIANA$10,000
KERITH FAMILY RECOVERY$10,000
FLOYD COUNTY 4-H CORPORATION BOARD INC$10,000
PROVINCE OF OUR LADY OF CONSOLIDATION AT MOUNT ST FRANCIS$10,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE: $25k → 15%FAMILY ARK INC: $9k → 10%CHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $94k → 10%RAUCH INC: $20k → 10%CHOICES LIFE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $15k → 10%HOPE SOUTHERN INDIANA: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 12 repeat orgs$495k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$3.8M
$440k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+4%

Still filing today

92%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Brandons House Counseling Center
    3× · 2022–2024 · $175k · revenue +157% · 25% of their budget
  • OP
    OUR PLACE DRUG AND ALCOHOL EDUCATION SERVICES INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $104k · revenue +12%
  • FC
    FLOYD COUNTY 4-H CORP INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +1% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • FF
    FIELDS FOR ALL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • MM
    Maker Mobile Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -35% · 40% of their budget
  • JJ
    JOHN JONES AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
    one grant, 2020 · $74k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
2
Family Service of Bartholomew County Inc

To strengthen and enhance the wellbeing of families and individuals throughout the life cycle and to advocate for a community environment that nurtures family life and promotes social responsibility.

Human Services
3
Family Service Inc

To provide family and individual counseling

—
4
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
5
Kentucky Intensive Family Services Inc

To provide a safe environment for children.

—
6
Indiana Family to Family

Indiana family to family (inf2f) is a unique statewide family-led organization that provides information, training, and peer support to caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs (cyshcn) and the professionals who…

—
7
Family & Children's Services of Mid-Michigan Inc

We inspire hope and well-being for people of all ages by providing counseling, education and support.

Human Services
8
Community Impact Programs Inc

Family counseling and child welfare

Human Services
9
First Choice for Women Inc

First choice for women exists to share the grace and truth of jesus christ and uphold the sanctity of human life while serving those facing unplanned pregnancies, promoting premarital sexual abstinence, and caring for those hurt by…

Health
10
Hope Family Ministries Inc

To provide biblical based counseling

Religion
11
Lifehouse Inc

Lifehouse, inc. provides for the spiritual, emotional, physical, and intellectual needs of pregnant and/or parenting teens and women and their children, both born and unborn.

Housing & Shelter
12
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family & Children's Place Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jacobs Well Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLOYD COUNTY TREASURER: $2,833,962 · OtherFLOYD COUNTY TREASURERPERSONAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $180,000 · Other+11 more: $514,536 · Other+11 moreBrandons House Counseling Center: $175,000 · EmploymentCHOICES FOR WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $109,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesRAUCH INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ARK INC: $9,121 · Human ServicesMaker Mobile Inc: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF OPEN DOOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $53,175 · Youth DevelopmentBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentJACOBS WELL INC: $77,959 · PhilanthropyCASA OF FLOYD COUNTY INC: $55,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropyParenting With Purpose Inc: $75,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN FORMATION MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $25,000 · ReligionNEW ALBANY - FLOYD COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · Education
Other$3,528,498Employment$175,000Human Services$173,121Youth Development$158,175Philanthropy$143,959Religion$100,000Education$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPERSONAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $180,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBrandons House Counseling Center: $175,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetCHOICES FOR WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $109,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetOUR PLACE DRUG AND ALCOHOL EDUCATION SERVICES INC: $103,621 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetFLOYD COUNTY 4-H CORP INC: $85,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetJACOBS WELL INC: $77,959 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMaker Mobile Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetParenting With Purpose Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 81% of budgetSt Elizabeth Catholic Charities Inc: $57,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCASA OF FLOYD COUNTY INC: $55,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF OPEN DOOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $53,175 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNEW ALBANY - FLOYD COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN FORMATION MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAUCH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO FALLS HOLINESS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE SOUTHERN INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLARK & FLOYD INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY ARK INC: $9,121 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Horseshoe Foundation …Community Foundation …Floyd Memorial Founda…Hazel & Walter Bales …Metro United Way IncThe Whas Crusade for …Paul Ogle Foundation …The Gheens Foundation…Mightycause Charitabl…Kosair Charities Comm…Duke Energy FoundationLilly Endowment Inc
Horseshoe Foundation of Floyd County IncIN47.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Horseshoe Foundation of Floyd County Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Indiana Inc · Floyd Memorial Foundation Inc · Hazel & Walter Bales Foundation · Metro United Way Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Paul Ogle Foundation Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Floyd County Legacy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Floyd County Legacy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Floyd County Legacy Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Floyd County Legacy Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Floyd County Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home