· Public charity
Florida Watch Inc
Educating the public and promoting social welfare in florida by holding elected officials accountable and ensuring representation of their constituents.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DW PAC | $250,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocacy for fair representation of florida voters through education, research and legal intervention
Engage florida civic fund builds civic equity and power through voter engagement, civic education, leadership development, and local and state issue advocacy.
To focuses on public education and advocacy to generate public awareness of programs and services available to immigrants in Florida.
Floridians protecting freedom advocated for the citizen-led ballot initiative that limits government interference with reproductive freedom through petition circulation and voter outreach.
Partnering with organizations and grassroots volunteers we build the power of Floridians: registering and re-engaging voters who are unseen and unheard and electing more leaders that share our values making state legislature more diverse.
Voter education and awareness
To lead and engage in campaigns and strategic alliances that build leadership, inform citizens, and achieve collective victories for the Puerto Rican and Latino communities in Central Florida, ultimately improving the quality of life for…
To provide citizens with independent research on government fiscal policy and to promote the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars
To support Florida's Voting Restoration Amendment which would allow people who have paid their debt to society to earn back their right to vote.
The mission is to gather, analyze and disseminate data and information relating to the government of Florida at the state, county and municipal levels and the issues which impact and affect their ability to govern, including, but not…
The corporation operates exclusively for the promotion of social welfare as permitted in section 501(c)(4) of the internal revenue service code of the united states, by, including but not limited to, research, education, and communication…
The organization's exempt purpose is political advocacy, to promote awareness and fairness in florida and in the united states taxation.
How this is measured
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PEOPLE OVER PROFITS FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds A BETTER MIAMI DADE INC ↗
- Who funds America Votes ↗
- Who funds VOTO LATINO INC ↗
- Who funds PROGRESS FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ACRONYM ↗
- Who funds Florida For All INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION ↗
- Who funds RUTH'S LIST FLORIDA ACTION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds PROGRESS FLORIDA EDUCATION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE COMMON GROUND PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO ADVANCE CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES INC ↗
- Who funds EQUISLABS ↗
- Who funds Project 68 Inc ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL FLORIDIANS INC ↗
- Who funds HER FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA CONSERVATION VOTERS INC ↗
- Who funds RAPID RESIST ACTION ↗
- Who funds ENGAGE MIAMI INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: America Votes · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Foundation · Florida Advancement Project Inc · Tides Advocacy · The People Over Profits Florida Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Hopewell Fund · Future Forward USA Action · Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Florida Watch Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florida Watch Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Ruth's List Florida Action: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Florida Watch Inc?
Find your warmest path to Florida Watch Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Florida Watch’s filings →