· Public charity
Florida Advancement Project Inc
None
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $112k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $431k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM | $1,620,000 |
| FLORIDA WATCH | $838,000 |
| FLORIDA FOR EVERYONE | $585,000 |
| STUDENTS FOR FREEDOM | $250,000 |
| AMERICA VOTES | $205,500 |
| TIDES ADVOCACY | $75,000 |
| RUTHS LIST FLORIDA ACTION | $50,500 |
| FLORIDA RISING INC | $50,000 |
| WOMENS VOICES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA | $50,000 |
| COMMITTEE ON STATES | $32,000 |
| MI FAMILIA VOTA | $25,000 |
| ENGAGE MIAMI | $20,000 |
| EQUALITY FLORIDA ACTION | $15,000 |
| TECH FOR CAMPAIGNS | $10,000 |
| MI VECINO | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $618k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FWFLORIDA WATCH INC4× · 2021–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +50% · 53% of their budget
- TATIDES ADVOCACY3× · 2021–2024 · $150k · revenue +18%
- EFEQUALITY FLORIDA ACTION INC2× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- EGEQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $215k · revenue -98% · 36% of their budget
- TPTHE PEOPLE OVER PROFITS FLORIDA INCone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue 0%
- UUNIDOSUSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $32k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocacy for fair representation of florida voters through education, research and legal intervention
Engage florida civic fund builds civic equity and power through voter engagement, civic education, leadership development, and local and state issue advocacy.
Partnering with organizations and grassroots volunteers we build the power of Floridians: registering and re-engaging voters who are unseen and unheard and electing more leaders that share our values making state legislature more diverse.
Voter education and awareness
Florida conservation voters is a nonpartisan, non-profit 501c (4) organization dedicated to making conservation and environmental protection a top priority for elected officials, political candidates, and voters across the state. we do…
To lead and engage in campaigns and strategic alliances that build leadership, inform citizens, and achieve collective victories for the Puerto Rican and Latino communities in Central Florida, ultimately improving the quality of life for…
To support Florida's Voting Restoration Amendment which would allow people who have paid their debt to society to earn back their right to vote.
To focuses on public education and advocacy to generate public awareness of programs and services available to immigrants in Florida.
None
Advocacy and passage of initiatives to eliminate the partisan primary to allow all voters to vote in the primary for any candidate.
The purpose of the league of women voters of florida is to promote political responsibility through informed and active participation in government and to act on selected government issues. the league shall not support or oppose any…
Fair fight action promotes fair elections in georgia and around the country, encourages voter participation in elections, educates voters about elections and their voting rights, and advocates for progressive issues.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equality Florida Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project 68 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FLORIDA WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDIANS PROTECTING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds ACRONYM INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds America Votes ↗
- Who funds RUTH'S LIST FLORIDA ACTION ↗
- Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds MI VECINO INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE OVER PROFITS FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds MI FAMILIA VOTA ↗
- Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE ON STATES ↗
- Who funds FORWARD ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE COMMON GROUND PROJECT FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ENGAGE MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds Project 68 Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ALLIANCE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · Tides Foundation · Florida Watch Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Tides Advocacy · Floridians Protecting Freedom · Hopewell Fund · Florida Alliance for Civic Engagement Inc · Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Florida Advancement Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ruth's List Florida Action — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Florida Advancement Project Inc?
Find your warmest path to Florida Advancement Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.