Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
See schedule othe people over profits florida, inc.
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of THE PEOPLE OVER PROFITS FLORIDA INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 51% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote social welfare primarily by developing and advocating for legislation, regulations, and government programs to improve the environment, access to healthcare, strong public services and voting rights; conducting research and…
Educate public pension trustees and administrators.
Improving communication, strategic planning and sharing of tools among 501(c)3 organizations working to further civic participation; improving the ability of 501(c)3 organizations to communicate effectively about civic issues; increasing…
To increase civic and electoral engagement across the country through the creation and sustainability of culturally competent, community driven digital and communications infrastructure, messaging, and content that learns from, speaks to,…
To promote the well being, cooperation and prosperity of the owners, managers, employees, and specialties engaged in the business of broadcasting and television in florida.
Advocacy for fair representation of florida voters through education, research and legal intervention
To promote podiatric physicians as the preferred providers of medicine and surgery of the foot, ankle, & lower extremity in the state of florida and elevate public knowledge of podiatric medicine and surgery at all levels throughout the…
To promote life safety, property protection, & resiliency by empowering the community with knowledge & resources for strengthening homes & safeguarding families.
To help pediatrics improve the health and welfare of florida's children.
Floridians protecting freedom (fpf) is a statewide campaign of allied organizations and concerned citizens working together to limit government interference with abortion. we recognize that all floridians deserve the freedom to make…
Success for our member and our profession through connecting, learning, and leading.
The professional opticians of florida is dedicated to enhancing the competency of opticians, advancing the profession of opticianry, and working to resolve the governmental policy issues affecting opticianry.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project 68 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: A Better Miami Dade Inc · Florida Watch Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation THE PEOPLE OVER PROFITS FLORIDA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PROJECT 68' INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 5 filed years.
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 852760084 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PROJECT 68' INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to The People Over Profits Florida Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.