Skip to content
Florida Clinical Practice Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Florida Clinical Practice Association Inc

The Florida Clinical Practice Association, Inc.

$784M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$772M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.3BHealth$277kPublic Benefit$32kHuman Services$16k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$772,195,391
Median grant
1
States reached
$386M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Florida$772,195,391
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Peaceful Paths Inc: $6k → 19%Peaceful Paths Inc: $5k → 19%Peaceful Paths Inc: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3B · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$5.3B
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-26%

Still filing today

90%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $78k · revenue +114%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +33%
  • TR
    THE RON AND DIANNE FARB CLIMB FOR CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $32k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SF
    SEBASTIAN FERRERO FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • AC
    ADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -26%
  • SF
    SANTA FE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
2
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
5
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
10
Central Florida Health Care Coalition Inc

The organization provides healthcare research and education to members and the public.

Health
11
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
12
Alcides E Rosaura Diniz Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $5,317,955,045 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA+5 more: $148,600 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $29,000 · HealthSHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC: $15,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $11,000 · HealthADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION: $7,500 · HealthGENETIC ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE RON AND DIANNE FARB CLIMB FOR CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · PhilanthropyPEACEFUL PATHS INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES: $5,000 · Education
Other$5,318,103,645Health$102,500Philanthropy$32,000Human Services$16,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTOP CHILDREN'S CANCER INC: $78,100 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetTALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RON AND DIANNE FARB CLIMB FOR CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $29,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetOcala Royal Dames For Cancer Research Inc: $20,500 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetPEACEFUL PATHS INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGENETIC ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gainesville Charitabl…State Chartered Credi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gainesville Charitable FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gainesville Charitable Foundation · State Chartered Credit Unions in Florida · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florida Clinical Practice Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florida Clinical Practice Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Peaceful Paths Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Genetic Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Florida Clinical Practice Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home