· Private foundation
Fleischmann Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $96k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOODCOCK NATURE PRESERVE INC | $20,000 |
| CINCINNATI OFF-ROAD ALLIANCE | $13,000 |
| GREEN UMBRELLA | $13,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY | $13,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS | $10,000 |
| WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| 100 FRIENDS | $7,000 |
| ST CHRISTOPHER'S EPISCOPAL CHURH | $7,000 |
| AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST | $7,000 |
| DEGA MOBILE VETERINARY CARE | $6,000 |
| HARMONY ANIMAL RESCUE CLINIC | $6,000 |
| UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS | $6,000 |
| KESTREL LAND TRUST | $6,000 |
| CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $5,000 |
| CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA7× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +241%
- SFSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC4× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +164%
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $974k
- HUHARVARD UNIVERSITY FBO DUMBARTON OAKSone grant, 2018 · $600k
- TCThe Christ Hospital Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +527%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.
To conserve and restore the natural and cultural resources of the chesapeake bay watershed for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. we serve as a catalyst for change, advancing strong public and private…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association and the most unlike its peers is Dega Mobile Veterinary Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT YOGA INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORRAL RIDING ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPHY ↗
- Who funds GREEN UMBRELLA ↗
- Who funds SPOLETO FESTIVAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds DEGA Mobile Veterinary Care ↗
- Who funds HARMONY ANIMAL RESCUE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds International Mountain Bicycling Association ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CHATHAM WATERWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds 100 FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds MADEIRA & INDIAN HILL FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Bernard and Judy Cornwell Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Weller Family Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Hcs Foundation · Cape Cod Foundation Inc · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Haselton Gove Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fleischmann Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc — 100% of income from government
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Atlantic White Shark Conservancy Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Chatham Historical Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- We Can Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fleischmann Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fleischmann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.