Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fitzgerald Family Foundation Inc % Mary-Owens Fitzgerald

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2022
35
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Arts & Culture$75kReligion$52kEducation$31kScience & Tech$12kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$8kRecreation & Sports$7kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2022 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$420k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NC MUSEUM OF ART$3,012
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NC SYMPHONY$2,530
NC MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCE$2,530
CAROLINA BALLET$2,530
NC OPERA COMPANY$2,500
METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN$1,500
LAKE JUNALUSKA ASSOCIATION$1,500
NC MUSEUM OF HISTORY$1,250
WOMEN'S GIVING NETWORK OF WAKE CO$1,200
NC THEATRE$1,000
DUKE DIVINITY SCHOOL$1,000
UNC-GREENSBORO$1,000
WEE CARE CHILDREN'S ENRICHMENT$1,000
TRANSITION LIFECARE OF WAKE CO$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 8%METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 8%METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $1k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $1k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $1k → 8%METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%METHODIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $400 → 8%READ & FEED: $1k → 8%READ & FEED: $200 → 8%GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$231k · 36 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
14

Total granted

$231k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+36%

Still filing today

39%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +51%
  • CAROLINA BALLET INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $16k · revenue +43%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • SN
    SOIL NORTH CAROLINA FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NC-GREENSBORO
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Biotechnology Center

The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…

Science & Tech
2
Nc Budget & Tax Center

As a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, we work to document and analyze fiscal and economic conditions in partnership with community leaders and north carolinians with lived experience of poverty to advance systemic solutions through…

Civil Rights
3
The Resiliency Collaborative Inc

Trc partners with bipoc youth and their ecosystems to strengthen their sense of identity, belonging, and purpose so they can create a healthier, more equitable wake county.

Education
4
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
5
North Carolina Bar Association

The north carolina bar association is organized for the purposes of promoting and improving the administration of justice in north carolina; fostering and encouraging law reform when in the public interest; advancing the science of…

6
Care Share Health Alliance Inc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…

Health
7
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
8
Wake County Smart Start Inc

Wake county smart start invests in young children, their families, and a connected early childhood system that supports and prepares them for school and life ahead.

Education
9
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

10
Family Promise of Wake County Inc

Moving families at risk of or experiencing homelessness into sustainable, permanent housing in our community through a continuum of support services.

Housing & Shelter
11
Note in the Pocket Inc

Note in the pocket provides clothing to impoverished and homeless school children in wake county with dignity and love. we believe it is unacceptable that children in wake county are limited in their educational and social development…

Human Services
12
Triangle Global Health Consortium Inc

The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Abundance Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr12%35%35–55yr9%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr14%8%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr9%54%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
1/21
the rest of the field
14%
1,328/9,168

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAYES BARTON UMC CHURCH — $47,075 · OtherHAYES BARTON UMC CHURCHNC MUSEUM OF ART — $18,897 · OtherNC MUSEUM OF ARTIndividual grant recipient — $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNC MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCE — $12,296 · OtherNC MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCENC MUSEUM OF HISTORY — $7,628 · OtherNC OPERA COMPANY — $7,500 · OtherWOMEN'S GIVING NETWORK OF WAKE CO — $7,200 · OtherNC ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS — $6,000 · Other+35 more — $44,452 · Other+35 moreCAROLINA BALLET INC — $15,798 · Arts & CultureCAROLINA BALL…NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC — $12,906 · Arts & CultureNORTH CAROLIN…NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Arts & CultureDUKE UNIVERSITY — $17,400 · EducationDUKE UNIVE…HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationHIGH POINT…The Methodist Home for Children Inc — $7,785 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $3,658 · Human ServicesREAD AND FEED — $1,200 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesLake Junaluska Assembly Inc — $4,000 · ReligionABILITIES TENNIS ASSOCIATION OF NC — $2,700 · Recreation & SportsFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$169,048Arts & Culture$29,704Education$21,400Human Services$12,743Religion$4,000Recreation & Sports$2,700Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $17,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA BALLET INC — $15,798 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC — $12,906 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Methodist Home for Children Inc — $7,785 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLake Junaluska Assembly Inc — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $3,658 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABILITIES TENNIS ASSOCIATION OF NC — $2,700 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE AREA OPERATION INASMUCH — $2,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Abundance Foundation Inc — $1,275 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM ARTS COUNCIL INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREAD AND FEED — $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAKE COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CAROLINA BALLET INC
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds The Methodist Home for Children Inc
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Lake Junaluska Assembly Inc
  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
  • Who funds ABILITIES TENNIS ASSOCIATION OF NC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
  • Who funds FAYETTEVILLE AREA OPERATION INASMUCH
  • Who funds The Abundance Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CHATHAM ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds READ AND FEED
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC29.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Bell Koonce Burnette Foundation · Bell Schaefer Family Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · John William Pope Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fitzgerald Family Foundation Inc % Mary-Owens Fitzgerald funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fitzgerald Family Foundation Inc % Mary-Owens Fitzgerald?

    Find your warmest path to Fitzgerald Family Foundation Inc % Mary-Owens Fitzgerald through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph