Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fishman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$465kPhilanthropy$176kHuman Services$15kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $111k
$5,963
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA$47,358
Individual grant recipient$33,000
CTZ$21,000
TORAS EMES ACADEMY$10,000
SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLSQ$6,450
BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,963
KOLLEL KINYAN TORAH$5,571
GAN ISRAEL CENTER$526
SHAARE ZION$500
Individual grant recipient$330
KEREN HAYELED HATZALAH$200
BNAI TORAH MOVEMENT$136
CHIZUK HATORAH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $36 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$471k · 17 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

$471k
$132k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+53%

Still filing today

18%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • SS
    SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $12k · revenue +4%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +128%
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KHAL TORAS CHAIM
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SY
    SHOR YOSHUV
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School

To provide academic excellence in both limudei kodesh and secular studies.

—
2
Yotzer Ohr Inc

Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…

Education
3
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Hadar South Florida High School for Girls Inc

A religious girls high school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
7
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
8
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
11
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
12
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Har Torah; the most unlike its peers is We Love to Help. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CTZ: $70,500 · OtherCTZBMG (BETH MEDRASH GAVOHA): $65,000 · OtherBMG (BETH MEDRASH GAVOHA)Individual grant recipient: $64,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $54,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $47,358 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHAJUDAIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherJUDAIC HERITAGE FOUNDATIONTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC: $35,000 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INCNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $25,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherKOLLEL KINYAN TORAH INC: $20,571 · OtherCONGREGATION KHAL TORAS CHAIM: $20,000 · Other+29 more: $112,782 · Other+29 moreJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $150,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $26,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUS…BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $19,900 · EducationSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $12,050 · EducationDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $36 · Human ServicesTORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $308 · Religion
Other$584,611Philanthropy$176,000Education$31,950Human Services$15,036Religion$10,308

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $26,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $19,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA HAR TORAH: $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $12,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $1,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $308 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE LOVE TO HELP: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA HAR TORAH ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY26.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Yale Fishman Family Foundation · Aminoff Philanthropic Tr · Sda Foundation · Gail & Maurice Setton Foundation Inc · The Mermelstein Foundation · Center for Initiatives in Jewish Education · Caroline & Joseph S Gruss Life Monument Funds Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Fjc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fishman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fishman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fishman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fishman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fishman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph