Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fishman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$465kPhilanthropy$176kHuman Services$15kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$3,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CTZ$22,000
BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD$7,500
SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLSQ$5,600
YOUNG ISRAEL OF GREAT NECK$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,250
GREAT NECK SYNAGOGUE$3,170
CHABAD OF WEST HEMPSTEAD$3,150
AISH HATORAH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$360
Individual grant recipient$151
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $36 → 20%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$369k · 12 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
22

Total granted

$369k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+53%

Still filing today

17%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B(
    BMG (BETH MEDRASH GAVOHA)
    2× · 2021–2023 · $65k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $54k
  • C
    CTZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +128%
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KHAL TORAS CHAIM
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SY
    SHOR YOSHUV
    one grant, 2021 · $17k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School

To provide academic excellence in both limudei kodesh and secular studies.

2
Yotzer Ohr Inc

Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…

Education
3
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
6
Hadar South Florida High School for Girls Inc

A religious girls high school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

8
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
9
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
10
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
12
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Har Torah and the most unlike its peers is We Love to Help. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BMG (BETH MEDRASH GAVOHA) — $65,000 · OtherBMG (BETH MEDRASH GAVOHA)Individual grant recipient — $54,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCTZ — $49,500 · OtherCTZJUDAIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherJUDAIC HERITAGE FOUNDATIONTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC — $35,000 · OtherTALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INCIndividual grant recipient — $31,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL — $25,300 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION KHAL TORAS CHAIM — $20,000 · OtherCHABAD OF GREAT NECK INC — $17,000 · OtherSHOR YOSHUV — $16,800 · Other+23 more — $80,227 · Other+23 moreJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $150,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $26,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF …BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC — $13,900 · EducationSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $5,600 · EducationDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $15,000 · Human Services+1 more — $36 · Human ServicesTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP — $308 · Religion
Other$463,927Philanthropy$176,000Education$19,500Human Services$15,036Religion$308

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $26,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC — $13,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA HAR TORAH — $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC — $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY — $1,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP — $308 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE LOVE TO HELP — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HOUSE OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC
  • Who funds YESHIVA HAR TORAH
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP
  • Who funds WE LOVE TO HELP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY26.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Yale Fishman Family Foundation · Aminoff Philanthropic Tr · Sda Foundation · Gail & Maurice Setton Foundation Inc · The Mermelstein Foundation · Center for Initiatives in Jewish Education · Caroline & Joseph S Gruss Life Monument Funds Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Fjc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fishman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fishman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fishman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph