· Public charity
Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc
Fiscal sponsorship allies, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $4,199,841 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,917,544 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $717,703 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $259k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $701k
- $250k+6 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CASHFORREFUGEES INC | $735,789 |
| FEDS 4 MED FREEDOM | $705,763 |
| BIRTHING CULTURAL RIGOR, LLC | $680,000 |
| 1 LIFE ORGANIZATION | $436,714 |
| MICROVERSE | $400,339 |
| ARTHOUSE NYC | $250,000 |
| 1K WOMENSTRONG INC. | $165,000 |
| THE ALOE FAMILY | $135,569 |
| THERAPIES FOR HOPE, INC. | $105,275 |
| FAMILY SKILLBUILDERS SERVICES | $102,293 |
| MOON FOUNDATION, INC | $77,150 |
| HEALTHY MINDS INITIATIVE INC | $65,695 |
| ACTIONS BEYOND WORDS | $50,005 |
| DROPOUT | $30,268 |
| THRIVE IMPACT FUND | $29,822 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHARITABLE ALLIES INC2× · 2021–2023 · $281k · revenue +45%
- AFAloe Family Inc2× · 2022–2024 · $271k · revenue +72% · 57% of their budget
FAMILY SKILLBUILDERS SERVICES2× · 2022–2024 · $205k · revenue +174%
Funded once
- MMACROCOSMone grant, 2023 · $297k
- MMODULOone grant, 2023 · $243k
- RHRESTORE HER VOICEone grant, 2023 · $159k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Changing Markets Foundation's mission is to accelerate and scale up solutions to sustainability challenges by leveraging the power of markets. Working in partnership with NGOs, other foundations, and research organizations, the…
"how to use the mind" is not typically taught as a class in itself. we don't presume to know everything about the mind's proper use, but we know the process of cultivating attention, compassion, and social-emotional intelligence is a long…
The mission of Farmers for Forests (F4F) is to restore and protect green cover in India in close partnership with farmers and indigenous communities. All the on-ground work is enabled by AI and multi-spectral drone technology and satellite…
To create awareness of the dangers of technology taking away the human touch of decision making in all aspects of life from politics to education to social realities. We aim to professionalize the industry, like doctors, lawyers and…
Promote gender equity in the film & television industry
The mission of Solar Cookers International is to improve human health, economic well-being, womens empowerment, and the environment by promoting climate-friendly solar cooking for vulnerable populations worldwide.
The Foundation for Applied Bio Linguistic Exploration (Fable) is a nonprofit exploring the intersection of narrative and technology, examining their combined impact on storytelling, the human condition, and neuroscience. We collaborate…
To build and deploy AI for free accessible mental health support in conflict zones
4C For All mission is to empower and uplift individuals in low-income, underserved global communities by providing free access to mental health education, emotional resilience tools, and support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restore Hope and the most unlike its peers is Federal Way Public Market. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 3 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 84% of your grantees by number, and just 91% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FEDS 4 MED FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds SEE FORWARD UKRAINE INC ↗
- Who funds MICROVERSE INC ↗
- Who funds 1K Women Strong Inc ↗
- Who funds RESTORE HOPE ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds Aloe Family Inc ↗
- Who funds ACTIONS BEYOND WORDS ↗
- Who funds THERAPIES FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SKILLBUILDERS SERVICES ↗
- Who funds INDIANA HEALTH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MOON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Healthy Minds Initiativesion ↗
- Who funds The Untied States FREE SPEECH UNION ↗
- Who funds Tent Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Village School of Louisville ↗
- Who funds Friends of Chinquapin Inc ↗
- Who funds SLEEPAWAKE INC ↗
- Who funds Federal Way Public Market ↗
- Who funds STAFFORD FARM SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Skillbuilders Services — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fiscal Sponsorship Allies Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.