Skip to content
First Peter 47-11 Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

First Peter 47-11 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$483kYouth Development$47kHuman Services$23kInternational$22kMembership Benefit$11kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$1kPublic Benefit$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$1,300
Median grant
9
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AG MISSIONS$30,650
TRINITY ASSEMBLY OF GOD$12,240
LIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL$5,800
HOPE ALIVE CHURCH$4,500
TEEN CHALLENGE OF ARKANSAS$2,950
TEEN CHALLENGE OF OKLAHOMA$2,500
REVIVAL FIRES INTERNATIONAL$2,400
JESUS FILM PROJECT$2,000
ALLEGRO$2,000
OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER$1,800
INDOPARTNERS AGENCY$1,800
VTN$1,754
LIFTING UP ZION$1,700
COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION$1,300
YOUNG LIFE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LIVADA ORPHAN CARE: $1k → 5%THE POTTERS CLAY MINITRIES: $100 → 17%LIVADA ORPHAN CARE: $1k → 5%LIVADA ORPHAN CARE: $1k → 5%LIVADA ORPHAN CARE: $1k → 5%Livada Orphan Care: $1k → 5%LIVADA ORPHAN CARE: $1k → 5%Livada Orphan Care: $1k → 5%Livada Orphan Care: $1k → 5%LIVADA ORPHAN CARE: $1k → 5%RIVER CITY MINISTRY: $200 → 17%THE CALL: $1k → 17%THE CALL: $1k → 17%THE CALL: $1k → 17%THE CALL: $1k → 17%THE CALL: $1k → 17%The Call: $1k → 17%The Call: $1k → 17%The Call: $1k → 17%THE CALL: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
TN
NC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$661k · 34 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
14

Total granted

$661k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-11%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationMembership BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE OF ARKANSAS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +86%
  • CT
    COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • IA
    INDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • LO
    Life Outreach Ministries
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RF
    Revival Fire Ministries Internation
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • AT
    ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One With God

To teach the bible to pastors and church leaders in africa and asia, while funding food for orphaned and abandonded children

Health
2
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
3
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
4
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Every Child Ministries

Christian mission offering hope to the forgotten children of africa and training leaders and teachers for african children.

International
6
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
7
Apt Ministries

To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.

Religion
8
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
9
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
10
Jon Potter Ministries Inc

This ministry functions as a teaching and counseling ministry that conducts bible study meetings not in a formal church setting. it provides individual biblical counseling

Religion
11
All Nation Mission

We expend every effort through biblical means to proclaim the message of jesus throughout the world to those who dont know him. we establish indigenous churches, train leaders, and serve the poor. we serve to introduce people and to…

International
12
For the Gospel Ministries

Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation; the most unlike its peers is Partners Against Trafficking Humans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $168,989 · OtherTRINITY ASSEMBLY OF GODGEN COUNCIL ASSY OF GOD WORLD MISSIONS: $95,410 · OtherGEN COUNCIL ASSY OF GOD WORLD MISSIONSGen Council Assy of God World Missi: $58,090 · OtherGen Council Assy of God World MissiAG MISSIONS: $52,010 · OtherAG MISSIONSLIFTING UP ZION INC: $37,465 · OtherLIFTING UP ZION INCLIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES INC: $23,900 · OtherREVIVAL FIRES INTERNATIONAL: $22,900 · Other+28 more: $93,427 · Other+28 moreADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE OF ARKANSAS INC: $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentDEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC: $12,450 · ReligionCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $10,300 · ReligionINDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC: $9,600 · ReligionJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionThe Path Inc: $2,070 · Religion+1 more: $50 · ReligionLIVADA ORPHAN CARE INC: $9,100 · Human ServicesTHE CALL: $9,000 · Human Services+3 more: $500 · Human ServicesAllegro: $13,000 · Membership BenefitCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center: $6,300 · HealthONECHILD GLOBAL: $5,785 · International
Other$552,191Youth Development$40,500Religion$39,470Human Services$18,600Membership Benefit$13,000Health$6,300International$5,785

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE OF ARKANSAS INC: $31,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAllegro: $13,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetDEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC: $12,450 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $10,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC: $9,600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLIVADA ORPHAN CARE INC: $9,100 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALL: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center: $6,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL: $5,785 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Path Inc: $2,070 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPARTNERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING HUMANS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE CHILD: $183 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOTTER'S CLAY MINISTRIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE OF ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Allegro ↗
  • Who funds DEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
  • Who funds INDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVADA ORPHAN CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE CALL ↗
  • Who funds Cabot Crisis Pregnancy Center ↗
  • Who funds ONECHILD GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds The Path Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING HUMANS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bolick FoundationArkansas Community Fo…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bolick FoundationNC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bolick Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First Peter 47-11 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First Peter 47-11 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First Peter 47-11’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home