Skip to content
First Lieutenant P F Cureton Jr Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

First Lieutenant P F Cureton Jr Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$453k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.3MCivil Rights$500kArts & Culture$418kEducation$407kHousing & Shelter$329kHealth$320kReligion$43kPublic Benefit$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$100,000
SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE$50,000
UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC$50,000
UPSTATECAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF$32,500
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES$30,000
PALMETTO PROJECT INC$25,000
DOLLY PARTONS IMAGINATION LIBRARY$20,000
HIRE HEROES USA$20,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$10,000
SAFE HARBOR INC$10,000
PENDLETON PLACE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $259k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 11%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $35k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $30k → 10%UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $22k → 10%UPSTATECAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $33k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $10k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $10k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $10k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $8k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $6k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $5k → 10%UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 18 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$3.0M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-22%

Still filing today

56%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $407k · revenue +129%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $120k · revenue +7%
  • UC
    UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS
    3× · 2017–2022 · $87k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FO
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • SS
    SC SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • CI
    COMMUNITYWORKS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Victim Assistance Network

The south carolina victim assistance network's mission is to ensure crime victims receive access to, and assistance from the criminal and juvenile justice systems and related social service providers; to improve the quality of services…

—
2
Community Alternatives Inc

To provide responsive, person-centered services to improve the quality of life of individuals with disabilities.

Employment
3
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
4
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
5
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
6
Compass of Carolina Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate direction to individuals and families in need through counseling, education and financial benefits management.

Education
7
United Housing Connections

We connect people at-risk for or experiencing homlessness with safe, sustainable, and affordable homes. we work to promote and preserve the dignity and quality of life for all citizens in upstate south carolina.

Community Improvement
8
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
9
The Family Violence Prevention Center Inc

Dedicated to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in wake county, nc. interact is a private, nonprofit agency that saves lives, rebuilds lives, and secures safer futures for victims, survivors, and their families. the agency…

—
10
Care Share Health Alliance Inc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…

Health
11
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
12
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Harbor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Julie Valentine Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
9/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CITADEL: $553,710 · OtherTHE CITADELSOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THE: $500,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FOR THETHE SALVATION ARMY: $310,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSALVATION ARMY OF GREENVILLE: $225,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF GREENVILLEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF: $140,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OFTHE SALVATION ARMY SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $135,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY SOCIAL MINISTRIESSOUTH CAROLINA SOCIETY FO: $100,000 · Other+12 more: $417,000 · Other+12 moreUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $407,075 · Human ServicesUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUT…UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $87,000 · Human ServicesUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRI…PENDLETON PLACE INC: $49,000 · Human ServicesPENDLETON PLACE INCUPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $32,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30,000 · Human ServicesNICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $130,881 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED MINISTRIES: $43,000 · ReligionCOMMUNITYWORKS INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE: $30,000 · HealthWARRIOR WOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthHIRE HEROES USA INC: $35,000 · Education
Other$2,380,710Human Services$650,575Arts & Culture$250,881Religion$43,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Health$40,000Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUPSTATE WARRIOR SOLUTION INC: $407,075 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $130,881 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $120,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS: $87,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetJULIE VALENTINE CENTER: $51,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetPENDLETON PLACE INC: $49,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $43,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITYWORKS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPALMETTO PROJECT INC: $37,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUPSTATE CAROLINA ADAPTIVE GOLF: $32,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSLATER MARIETTA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetCLARITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR WOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greenvi…The Jolley FoundationScsymmes FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Scansource Charitable…Hollingsworth Funds I…John I Smith Charitie…Charity Ball Board of…United Community Bank…Junior League of Gree…St Francis Hospital I…AWT Family Foundation
United Way of Greenville County IncSC26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greenville County Inc · The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · John I Smith Charities Inc · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · United Community Bank Foundation · Junior League of Greenville Inc · St Francis Hospital Inc · AWT Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First Lieutenant P F Cureton Jr Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First Lieutenant P F Cureton Jr Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First Lieutenant P F Cureton Jr Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home