Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

First Community Health Foundaton

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$622k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of FIRST COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATON’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $525k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RECOVERY ALLIANCE DULUTH$125,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
WELL BEING DEVELOPMENT$75,000
LAKE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE$50,000
MN SIXTH DISTRCIT TREAMENT COURT$50,000
HARM REDUCTION SISTERS$50,000
CHUM$50,000
CENTER CITY HOUSING$50,000
LIFE HOUSE$45,000
Individual grant recipient$36,960
DAMIANO CENTER$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARE PARTNERS OF COOK COUNTY: $20k → 9%CARE PARTNERS OF COOK COUNTY: $10k → 9%NORTHWOODS PARTNERS: $29k → 8%NORTHWOODS PARTNERS: $15k → 8%AGE WELL ARROWHEAD: $50k → 15%NORTHWOODS PARTNERS: $10k → 8%AGE WELL ARROWHEAD INC: $3k → 15%DAMIANO CENTER: $15k → 15%DAMIANO CENTER: $15k → 15%DAMIANO CENTER: $15k → 15%DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC: $15k → 15%DAMIANO CENTER: $15k → 15%DAMIANO CENTER: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of First Community Health Foundaton’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

First Community Health Foundatonlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 23 repeat orgs$580k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
19

Total granted

$2.4M
$393k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+158%

Still filing today

48%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RECOVERY ALLIANCE DULUTH INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $394k · revenue ×111 · 50% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENT
    4× · 2017–2024 · $304k · revenue +40%
  • LH
    LIFE HOUSE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $278k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • HH
    HEART HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • S
    SURC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • AA
    ARROWHEAD AREA AGENCY ON AGING
    one grant, 2024 · $55k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Duluth Cross Country Ski Club

Promote health through skiing

Recreation & Sports
2
Care Partners

To assist individuals with cancer and life-limiting illnesses

Health
3
Cokato Charitable Trust

The purpose of Cokato Charitable Trust division is to provide quality health and housing services that enhance the quality of life and maintain a maximum level of functioning for our residents.

4
NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc

Our mission is "Partnering to Create a Healthier Community." NorthPoint seeks to reduce health disparities, improve health outcomes, and enhance the overall quality of life for all residents of North Minneapolis

Health
5
North Central Mental Health Services Inc

To provide mental health and drug addiction services.

Health
6
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
7
Minnesota Recovery Connection

Minnesota Recovery Connection's mission is to strengthen the recovery community through peer-to-peer support, public education and advocacy.

Human Services
8
Community Resource Connections Inc

Improving access to and the effectiveness of services through facilitation and coordination of community services and provision of information and referral services.

Community Improvement
9
Minnesota Association of Community Mental Health Programs

In our belief and purpose, MACMHP operates to support and conduct non-partisan education and informational activities on mental health, chemical dependency, and related services and to provide leadership and services that strengthen member…

Education
10
Residential Services of Northeastern Minnesota Inc

Enhancing the lives of people with disabilities by providing innovative services that promote inclusion and self-determination.

Human Services
11
Lake Superior Community Health Center

To improve access to quality health care for all.

Health
12
Walker Adult Day Services

Walker Adult Day Services promotes healthy aging with the focus to improve and enhance overall wellness. Through a system of supportive services in one location the program conveniently assists people experiencing isolation due to physical…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Generations Health Care Initiatives Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RECOVERY ALLIANCE — $425,000 · OtherRECOVERY ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient — $225,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LOUIS COUNTY MN — $100,000 · OtherST LOUIS COUNTY MNHEART HEALTHY COMMUNITIES — $100,000 · OtherHEART HEALTHY COMMUNITIESSURC — $100,000 · OtherSURCCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY — $76,000 · OtherCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRYARROWHEAD AREA AGENCY ON AGING — $55,422 · OtherCENTER CITY HOUSING CORP — $50,000 · OtherMN SIXTH DISTRCIT TREAMENT COURT — $50,000 · Other+24 more — $202,525 · Other+24 moreRECOVERY ALLIANCE DULUTH INC — $393,500 · HealthRECOVERY ALLIANCE DULUTH INCCENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENT — $304,000 · HealthCENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENTHARM REDUCTION SISTERS — $225,000 · HealthHARM REDUCTION SISTERSWell Being Development — $125,000 · HealthWell Being DevelopmentLAKE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE — $50,000 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthLIFE HOUSE INC — $278,333 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE HOUSE…DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC — $87,500 · Human ServicesNorthwoods Partners — $54,277 · Human ServicesAge Well Arrowhead Inc — $52,500 · Human ServicesCare Partners of Cook County — $30,000 · Human ServicesDULUTH PLAYHOUSE INC — $500 · Arts & CultureDULUTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL COLLABORATIVE — $500 · Education
Other$1,383,947Health$1,102,500Youth Development$278,333Human Services$224,277Arts & Culture$500Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRECOVERY ALLIANCE DULUTH INC — $393,500 over 4y, 50% of budgetCENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENT — $304,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetLIFE HOUSE INC — $278,333 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetHARM REDUCTION SISTERS — $225,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetWell Being Development — $125,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetDAMIANO OF DULUTH INC — $87,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY — $76,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNorthwoods Partners — $54,277 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetAge Well Arrowhead Inc — $52,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetCare Partners of Cook County — $30,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetGENERATIONS HEALTH CARE INITIATIVES INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDULUTH PLAYHOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RECOVERY ALLIANCE DULUTH INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENT
  • Who funds LIFE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds HARM REDUCTION SISTERS
  • Who funds Well Being Development
  • Who funds DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY
  • Who funds Northwoods Partners
  • Who funds Age Well Arrowhead Inc
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE
  • Who funds CENTER CITY HOUSING CORP
  • Who funds Care Partners of Cook County
  • Who funds GENERATIONS HEALTH CARE INITIATIVES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duluth-Superior Area Community FoundationMN24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Northland Foundation · Smdc Medical Center · Head of the Lakes United Way · Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Ordean Foundation · Second Harvest Northland · Minnesota Power Foundation · Medica Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Pachel Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization First Community Health Foundaton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to First Community Health Foundaton?

    Find your warmest path to First Community Health Foundaton through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph