Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fioroni Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$700
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$750Human Services$535Health$450Food & Nutrition$350Philanthropy$250Animals$200Environment$150Religion$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
5
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Comm Found Gr Flt$100
Leelanau Conservancy$100
American Cancer Society$100
IHM Sisters$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Individual grant recipient$50
Individual grant recipient$50
Michigan Humane$50
MI Dyslexia Inst Inc$25
ALS Of Michigan$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($3k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($350) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tunnel Tower Found: $100 → 11%Shriners Children: $50 → 13%Michigan Humane Society: $50 → 5%Leelanau Conservancy: $100 → 7%Michigan Humane Society: $50 → 8%MI Dyslexia Inst Inc: $25 → 16%Flint Public Library: $100 → 16%Disabled American Veterans: $50 → 21%Shriners Childrens: $50 → 13%Michigan Humane Society: $50 → 5%Leelanau Conservancy: $50 → 7%Rochester Hills Public Library: $100 → 8%Food Bank of Eastern Michigan: $100 → 16%Disabled American Veterans: $25 → 21%ALS of Michigan: $25 → 8%Food Bank of Eastern Michigan: $100 → 16%Capuchin Soup Kitchen: $50 → 21%ALS Of Michigan: $25 → 8%Catholic Charities: $100 → 16%Michigan Humane: $50 → 21%ALS of Michigan: $25 → 8%Catholic Charities: $100 → 16%Capuchin Soup Kitchen: $50 → 21%Notre Dame Prep Academy: $250 → 8%Catholic Charities: $100 → 16%Notre Dame Prep Academy: $100 → 8%Flint Public Library: $100 → 16%IHM Sisters: $100 → 8%Flint Public Library: $100 → 16%Grace Centers of Hope: $50 → 8%Food Bank of Eastern Michigan: $50 → 16%Grace Centers of Hope: $50 → 8%Carriage Town Ministries: $25 → 16%Carriage Town Ministries: $25 → 16%Michigan Dyslexia Institute Inc: $50 → 16%Michigan Dyslexia Institute Inc: $25 → 16%Michigan Dyslexia Institute Inc: $25 → 16%Community Foundation of Greater Fli: $100 → 16%Community Foundation of Greater Fli: $100 → 16%Comm Found Gr Flt: $100 → 16%Community Foundation of Greater Fli: $50 → 16%Salvation Army of Genesee County: $10 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($350)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$350 · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Fioroni Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Fioroni Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2k · 12 repeat orgs$785 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$2k
$210

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+67%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $575 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
HealthFood & NutritionAnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2019–2023 · $150 · revenue +56%
  • MD
    MICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $100 · revenue +80%
  • GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $100 · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • RH
    Rochester Hills Public Library
    one grant, 2022 · $100
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50 · revenue +67%
  • SS
    SOAR Sister Kathleen Lunsmann
    one grant, 2023 · $50
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
2
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
3
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
4
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
5
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
6
Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
7
Mymichigan Medical Center Gladwin

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
8
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
9
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
10
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

—
11
Delta Dental Fund

Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.

—
12
Mymichigan Medical Center Clare

Creating healthy communities - together

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Flint; the most unlike its peers is Michigan Dyslexia Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Notre Dame Prep Academy: $350 · OtherNotre Dame Prep AcademyFlint Public Library: $300 · OtherFlint Public LibraryCatholic Charities: $300 · OtherCatholic CharitiesIndividual grant recipient: $100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRochester Hills Public Library: $100 · OtherRochester Hills Public LibraryComm Found Gr Flt: $100 · OtherComm Found Gr FltCapuchin Soup Kitchen: $100 · OtherCapuchin Soup KitchenSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY MONROE MICHIGAN INC: $100 · OtherSISTERS SERVANTS OF THE IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY MONROE MICHIGAN INCGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $100 · OtherGRACE CENTERS OF HOPEDisabled American Veterans: $75 · Other+6 more: $235 · Other+6 moreMICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC: $100 · HealthMICHIGAN DYS…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · HealthAMERICAN CAN…ALS OF MICHIGAN INC: $75 · HealthALS OF MICHI…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50 · HealthSHRINERS HOS…Food Bank of Eastern Michigan: $250 · Food & NutritionFood Bank…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 · AnimalsLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $150 · EnvironmentCarriage Town Ministries: $50 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,860Health$325Food & Nutrition$250Philanthropy$250Animals$150Environment$150Arts & Culture$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC: $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALS OF MICHIGAN INC: $75 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarriage Town Ministries: $50 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Food Bank of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN DYSLEXIA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ALS OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Carriage Town Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anna Paulina FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anna Paulina Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fioroni Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fioroni Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fioroni Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph