Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fels Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.8MReligion$562kYouth Development$543kPhilanthropy$354kAnimals$349kHealth$345kPublic Safety & Disaster$200kFood & Nutrition$161kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $376k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$500,000
ALL SAINTS ACADEMY$116,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$100,000
UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH$100,000
UNITED WAY$60,000
OUR BRIGHT FUTURE INC$40,700
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$21,000
WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE$20,000
ST ANDREW BOBOLA CHURCH$16,300
PASSION 4 PAWS$16,000
PARTNERS IN CHARITY$15,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$12,000
FRIENDS OF THE GLADYS$11,000
COMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $316k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $20k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $15k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $10k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $7k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $5k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $5k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $5k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $5k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $2k → 11%WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 75 repeat orgs$630k to everyone else

75 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
33

Total granted

$8.1M
$592k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+100%

Still filing today

29%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NICHOLS COLLEGE
    5× · 2018–2024 · $305k · revenue +2%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $200k · revenue +9%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $182k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHESTER C CORLIN
    one grant, 2018 · $202k
  • HH
    HARRINGTON HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • CC
    CAT CONNECTION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -56% · 58% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worcester County Humane Society Inc

To promote humane treatment of animals, operate the animal shelter, and assist with the adoption of animals.

Animals
2
Here Today Adopted Tomorrow Animal Sanctuary Inc

We focus on keeping pets with the people who love them. the organization has a cage-free adoption center for cats and kittens in brimfield, massachusetts. the organization also provides services and resources for local animals and…

Animals
3
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
4
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
5
Purrs and Whiskers Inc

Purrs and Whiskers primary function is to find forever homes for cats and kittens that are abandoned, stray, owner turn in, injured/sick, and/or born in feral colonies after we have fully vetted them by spaying/neutering, vaccinating,…

Animals
6
Animals in Distress Inc

Provides shelter, food, veterinary services and medicine for abandoned and stray cats. No cats are euthanized. All are placed in homes, foster homes or remain at the shelter.

Animals
7
Animal Rescue League of New Bedford Inc Dba Humane Society&Shelter-Southcoast

Animal rescue league of new bedford, inc., d/b/a humane society & shelter-southcoast, provides services to reduce the number of homeless pets. the organization provides quarantine services to other rescue organizations bringing animals…

Animals
8
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
9
Pawsitively Cats Inc

Pawsitively cats is a no-kill cat shelter in tucson for homeless cats that provides compassionate care until a loving permanent home can be found. pawsitively cats also promotes trap, neuter and release (tnr) for feral cats. pawsitively…

Animals
10
Pats Pets Corporation

Animal rescue

Animals
11
Collaborative Cats Inc

We are a feline foster home based rescue organization providing rescue, rehoming, low-cost spay & neutur services, vaccinations, and farm colony management.

Animals
12
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cat Connection Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $3,734,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF GLADYS KELLY LIBRARY: $601,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF GLADYS KELLY LIBRARYALL SAINTS ACADEMY: $406,850 · OtherALL SAINTS ACADEMYST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $381,535 · OtherUNITED WAY: $270,000 · Other+88 more: $2,112,654 · Other+88 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC: $182,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUR BRIGHT FUTURE INC: $163,930 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 · Human ServicesWEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $76,000 · Human ServicesCENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesNICHOLS COLLEGE: $305,000 · EducationCAT CONNECTION INC: $100,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC: $49,000 · AnimalsPAWS CAT SHELTER INC: $17,000 · AnimalsSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $12,100 · AnimalsPAT BRODY SHELTER FOR CATS INC: $7,500 · Animals+8 more: $19,350 · AnimalsWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $80,000 · Food & NutritionWORCESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK TAVERN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,100 · Arts & Culture
Other$7,506,039Youth Development$345,930Human Services$316,000Education$305,000Animals$204,950Food & Nutrition$80,000Arts & Culture$16,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNICHOLS COLLEGE: $305,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC: $182,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetOUR BRIGHT FUTURE INC: $163,930 over 8y, 43% of budgetCAT CONNECTION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC: $76,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetPassion 4 Paws Inc: $53,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC: $49,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS CAT SHELTER INC: $17,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWORCESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $12,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAT BRODY SHELTER FOR CATS INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE-SKILLS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOG ORPHANS INC: $4,850 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNEADY CATS CORP D/B/A CATS IN NEED: $4,050 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS LEAGUE INC: $3,450 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetTRI-VALLEY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,650 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetWORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $1,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK TAVERN HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $1,100 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTURTLE RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY HORSE EQUINE RESCUE INC: $200 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NICHOLS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WEBSTER-DUDLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR BRIGHT FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAT CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WEBSTER DUDLEY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Passion 4 Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CAT CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Worcester Community Foundation IncMA25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Aaf Charitable Foundation · The Janet Malser Humanities Trust · Webster Five Foundation Inc · Hometown Bank Community Foundation Inc · John J and Elizabeth M Kunkel & Family Foundation Inc · Coghlin Family Foundation · George Wells Foundation Ui · United Way of South Central Massachusetts Inc · Tonna Charitable Trust · The Fletcher Foundation · The White Companies Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fels Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fels Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Life-Skills Inc: 91% of income from government
  • Center of Hope Foundation Inc: 74% of income from government
  • Tri-Valley Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Worcester Natural History Society Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Animal Shelter Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Nichols College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fels Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fels Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fels Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph