· Private foundation
George Wells Foundation Ui
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $185k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC | $25,000 |
| CENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| TRI-VALLEY INC | $20,000 |
| THE ELLIE FUND | $15,000 |
| OPEN SKY COMMUNITY SERVICES | $15,000 |
| SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES | $15,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS ADOPTION RESOURCE EXCHANGE | $15,000 |
| GIRLS INC OF WORCESTER | $10,000 |
| LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF THE TRI-COMMUNITY | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WORCESTER | $10,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $10,000 |
| HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| BARTON CENTER FOR DIABETES EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| CITY TO SADDLE | $8,400 |
| THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $201k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCAPEN HILL NATURE ASSOCIATION INC7× · 2017–2023 · $185k · revenue +1% · 29% of their budget
- FHFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC5× · 2017–2021 · $120k · revenue +116%
- OSOLD STURBRIDGE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- QCQuinsigamond Community College Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +57%
- CPCASA PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +49%
- CMCENTRAL MASS AGENCY ONone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
To lead the assisted living industry in its service of seniors through advocacy, education, operational support, and enhanced growth opportunities.
Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.
To provide the community with comprehensive health care in dorchester, ma including primary and specialty care, home care, social services, women, infant and child care, and adult day health care.
To provide home care services, referrals and advocacy to the elderly population located in the boston area.
Provides community employment and awareness, vocational and developmental skills, to young adults and adults with autism and other developmental disabilities in central and eastern massachusetts. transportation services are also provided.…
Through support, challenge and opportunity, triangle empowers people with disabilities and their families to enjoy rich, fulfilling lives. we are committed to helping the world recognize that we are all people with ability.
We create opportunities for the people of massachusetts to transform their lives and build a more equitable commonwealth through the humanities.
The purpose and mission of community counseling of bristol county, inc. (ccbc) is to develop and deliver compassionate, responsive, culturally competent, and quality mental health and substance abuse services to meet the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc and the most unlike its peers is Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAPEN HILL NATURE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC ↗
- Who funds OLD STURBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds ELLIE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Harrington Memorial Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF THE TRI-COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds DUDLEY-CHARLTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Quinsigamond Community College Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN SKY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE-SKILLS INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF WORCESTER ↗
- Who funds ASCENSION CAREER TRAINING INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARTON CENTER FOR DIABETES EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds HEART OF NEW ENGLAND COUNCIL BSA INC ↗
- Who funds THE TREEHOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Webster Five Foundation Inc · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · United Way of South Central Massachusetts Inc · The Fred Harris Daniels Foundation · Hometown Bank Community Foundation Inc · Tr Ua Albert W Rice Char · Fallon Community Health Plan Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Ma · Ruth H & Warren a Ellsworth Foundation · The Health Foundation of Central Massach · The White Companies Charitable Trust · The Fletcher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George Wells Foundation Ui funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Life-Skills Inc — 91% of income from government
- Pathways for Change Inc — 86% of income from government
- Center of Hope Foundation Inc — 74% of income from government
- Tri-Valley Inc — 68% of income from government
- Open Sky Community Services Inc — 48% of income from government
- Family Health Center of Worcesterinc — 39% of income from government
- The Treehouse Foundation Inc — 23% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Ellie Fund Inc — 15% of income from government
- Community Legal Aid Inc — 5% of income from government
- Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
- Girls Incorporated of Worcester — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.