Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc

Feeding tampa bay envisions flourishing communities today and for generations to come which we will accomplish by building people-focused solutions.

$180M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $2,929,997 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $179,514,196 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $176,584,199 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$2,929,997
Median grant
1
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAMPA BAY HUNGER RELIEF CENTER INC$2,929,997
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TAMPA BAY HUNGER RELIEF CENTER INC: $2.9M → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
2
People Help Exchange Inc

Food Pantry to combat hunger and prevent homelessness.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
4
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
5
Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health
6
Heart of Putnam Food Pantry Inc Sharing Putnams Bounty

Providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
7
St Vincent De Paul Pro-Life Homeless Inc

Help for homeless

8
Lamp of Hope Ministry Inc

Lamp of Hope Ministries is a non profit organization committed to improving the well-being of families and individuals facing poverty homelessness domestic abuse low literacy military family service major illness and the aftermath of…

Human Services
9
Hallelujah Pantry Inc

To provide residents in the community with food - the basic need they have to survive and thrive. Many residents dont know where their next meal is coming from. By responsibly distributing food to people in need - including children, the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
11
God Provides Ministry

To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others

Food & Nutrition
12
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Countryside Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cowboys for Christ Fl Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyTrade Union LocalsConstruction Industry Trade…University Medical ResearchUniversity Medical ResearchCommunity Development & Emp…Education Coalitions & Part…Hospice and End-of-Life Care
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%6%<5yr17%17%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr13%17%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr14%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%100%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr13%0%20–35yr10%0%35–55yr14%0%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 100% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/259
the rest of the field
18%
3,133/17,815

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20232025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/109
Grantees still filing
39/109
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTAMPA BAY HUNGER RELIEF CENTER INC — $2,929,997 over 2y, 100% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL56.5× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · United Way of Central Florida Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · The Florida Medical Clinic Foundation of Caring Inc · Givewell Community Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2325

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $180M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph