Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$250kHuman Services$208kReligion$195kYouth Development$175kHousing & Shelter$130kHealth$125kPublic Benefit$15k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER$27,842
LIBERTY COUNSEL INC$25,000
CHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOL$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FL$20,000
FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC$20,000
THE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $28k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $26k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $25k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $25k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $25k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $25k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $24k → 10%CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $24k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $20k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $20k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $10k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $10k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
0%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Christian Care Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $203k · revenue +96%
  • FP
    FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +750%
  • SI
    SUNRISEARC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $70k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • UW
    United way of Lake Sumter
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIBERTY COUNSEL INC: $195,000 · OtherLIBERTY COUNSEL INCCHRISTIAN HOME BIBLE SCHOOL: $150,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN HOME BIBLE SCHOOLCHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOLBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF Central Fl: $70,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF Central FlBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF LAKE COUNTY: $50,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF LAKE COUNTYTHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $35,000 · OtherTHE ARC SUNRISE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA+4 more: $35,000 · Other+4 moreChristian Care Center Inc: $202,805 · Human ServicesChristian Care Center IncSUNRISEARC INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISEARC INCFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORWARD PATHS FOUN…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS…THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $12,500 · HealthMercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast: $7,500 · HealthTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$610,000Human Services$272,805Youth Development$180,000Health$20,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $202,805 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetSUNRISEARC INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISEARC INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Flight SE Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale TrustFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edgar P & Nona B McKinney Charitbale Trust · Hunter Matthew & Mildred Char Ta · Martin G Roxy & Eliz C Fdn Ta · Williams M M & R P Fdn Ta · Monar Fred B Helen Char Co-Ta · Barry C Warren Fdn Ta · William M and Marian R Haywood Charitable Trust · Dorothy B C Steves Char Ta · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Flight Se Inc dba Angel Flight Southeast: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta?

Find your warmest path to Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fawley Gertrude C Char Tr Ta’s filings →

More from the funding graph