Skip to content

· Private foundation

Farr Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$740kReligion$463kPublic Safety & Disaster$165kHealth$100kHuman Services$68kFood & Nutrition$40kHousing & Shelter$40k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
$7,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHU$30,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$30,000
THE SOLANUS MEDICAL MISSION$20,000
WASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMY$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ARLIN$10,000
BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY$10,000
AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE$10,000
DON BOSCO CRISTO REY$10,000
DISCALCED CARMELITE NUNS$7,500
ST DOMINIC'S MONASTERY$7,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
LITTLE WORKERS OF THE SACRED HEARTS$5,000
JESUITS USA EAST ADVANCEMENT OFFICE$5,000
BASILICA OF SAINT MARY$5,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
PA
NJ
UT
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 20 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$1.6M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+35%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $463k · revenue +47%
  • BC
    BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +8%
  • Augustine Institute Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +35%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $165,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESWASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMY: $120,000 · OtherWASHINGTON JESUIT ACADEMYST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCH: $110,000 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCHDON BOSCO CRISTO REY: $95,000 · OtherDON BOSCO CRISTO REYST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHU: $75,000 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHUSOLANUS MEDICAL MISSION INC: $55,000 · OtherSOLANUS MEDICAL MISSION INCGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $52,500 · OtherGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCTHE SOLANUS MEDICAL MISSION: $45,000 · OtherSOME INC: $40,000 · OtherLITTLE WORKERS OF THE SACRED HEARTS: $35,000 · Other+12 more: $152,500 · Other+12 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $462,500 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $105,000 · EducationBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITYAugustine Institute Inc: $60,000 · EducationAugustine Institute IncFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $40,000 · InternationalLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$945,000Education$627,500International$40,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $462,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $105,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $60,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Farr Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Farr Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Farr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph