Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Farmers Union Industries Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of FARMERS UNION INDUSTRIES FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$232k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LONG PRAIRIE EMER FOOD SHELF$6,500
REDWOOD AREA FOOD SHELF$6,500
UDMO - EMMET COUNTY OUTREACH$6,500
MITCHELL FOOD PANTRY$6,500
MANNA FOOD PANTRY$3,500
WORTHINGTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH FOOD S$3,500
BROWERVILLE AREA FOOD SHELF$3,500
RENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF$3,500
MORRISON COUNTY FOOD SHELF$2,500
WE CARE PROJECT$2,500
SAUK CENTRE COMMUNITY CONNECTION$2,000
REDWOOD FALLS FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LONG PRAIRIE FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WINDOM AREA SHARING CENTER: $500 → 13%WINDOM AREA SHARING CENTER: $300 → 13%WE CARE PROJECT: $3k → 11%WE CARE PROJECT: $2k → 11%WE CARE PROJECT: $2k → 11%WE CARE PROJECT: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
ND
MN
WI
MI
SD
IA
MO
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Farmers Union Industries Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Farmers Union Industries Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 30 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -40% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
57

Total granted

$1.6M
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-40%

Still filing today

40%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    REDWOOD AREA COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +68%
  • RA
    REDWOOD AREA FOOD SHELF INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +80%
  • RC
    RENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • ND
    NORTH DAKOTA FARMERS UNION ED FOUND
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • MC
    MT COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • VE
    VERNON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hubbard County Food Shelf

Receive and dispense food to needy clients

2
Browns Valley Food Shelf Inc
Food & Nutrition
3
South County Community Food Bank

Providing nutritious food to low income families and individuals in south clatsop county

Food & Nutrition
4
Loaves and Fishes Food Shelf
Food & Nutrition
5
Mitchell County Food Bank Corporation

Provide food assistance to low income families

6
Vermillion County Christian Food Center

Community food pantry

Food & Nutrition
7
Adams County Food Pantry
Food & Nutrition
8
Faribault County Food Shelf

To provide food for people with low income within Faribault County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
10
Wabasha Area Food Share Inc

Community Food Shelf offering free food to low income area residents

11
Prairie Ridge Food Pantry

tohelpfightfoodinsecurity.wereviveandgivedonatedfooditemstothoselessfortunate.

Food & Nutrition
12
Pratt County Foodbank Inc

County food bank to assist with food needs of limited income families

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Watonwan County Food Shelf Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cooperative Education Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SDFU FOUNDATION — $374,000 · OtherSDFU FOUNDATIONWI FARMERS UNION FOUNDATION — $130,000 · OtherWI FARMERS UNION FOUNDATIONMNFU EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $105,000 · OtherMNFU EDUCATION FOUNDATIONNDFU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $79,000 · OtherNDFU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONNORTH DAKOTA FARMERS UNION ED FOUND — $50,000 · OtherREDWOOD AREA COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherMT COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $45,000 · Other+77 more — $181,300 · Other+77 moreNATIONAL FARMERS UNION FOUNDATION — $642,500 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL FARMERS UNION FOUNDATIONCOOPERATIVE EDUCATION CORPORATION — $72,500 · Food & NutritionCOOPERATIVE EDUCATION CORPORATION+6 more — $44,400 · Food & Nutrition+6 moreVERNON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 · Community ImprovementWE CARE PROJECT — $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE WINDOM AREA SHARING CENTER INC — $800 · Human Services
Other$1,014,300Food & Nutrition$759,400Community Improvement$40,000Human Services$7,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL FARMERS UNION FOUNDATION — $642,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetCOOPERATIVE EDUCATION CORPORATION — $72,500 over 5y, 46% of budgetREDWOOD AREA COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetVERNON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetREDWOOD AREA FOOD SHELF INC — $16,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetMITCHELL FOOD PANTRY — $14,500 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetMANNA FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetRENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF — $6,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetWE CARE PROJECT — $6,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMORRISON COUNTY FOOD SHELF — $5,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWAFER INC — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINDOM AREA SHARING CENTER INC — $800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOutreach Foodshelf — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL FARMERS UNION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE EDUCATION CORPORATION
  • Who funds REDWOOD AREA COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VERNON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds REDWOOD AREA FOOD SHELF INC
  • Who funds MITCHELL FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds RENVILLE COUNTY FOOD SHELF
  • Who funds WE CARE PROJECT
  • Who funds MORRISON COUNTY FOOD SHELF

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Land O'Lakes FoundationMN24.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · Hunger Solutions Minnesota · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Farmers Union Industries Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Farmers Union Industries Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Farmers Union Industries Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph