Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fara Foundation Formerly Known as Foundacion Fara

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$36kHuman Services$32kReligion$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kHealth$12kInternational$5kFood & Nutrition$3kEmployment$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$26,390
UT AUSTIN-LITERACY FIRST$7,500
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$5,300
GOD'S PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE$5,000
RAMJAANE JOSUA FOUNDATION$2,500
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$2,500
OPERATION GAME THIEF$2,500
MISSION POSSIBLE AUSTIN$2,500
HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC$2,500
MORE THAN WELCOME$2,500
ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INKIND INC: $15k → 10%INKIND INC: $10k → 10%InKind Inc: $2k → 10%Meals on Wheels: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 6 repeat orgs$179k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$85k
$134k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+58%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    INKIND INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $27k · revenue -2%
  • UA
    UT AUSTIN-LITERACY FIRST
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18k
  • RJ
    RAMJAANE JOSUA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $15k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • TL
    TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • AI
    AVANCE Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
2
Welcome Table Incorporated

We provide assistance to families in east Austin to improve their lives through better nutrition, better health care, healthier lifestyles, better educational opportunities, and cultural diversity activities.

Food & Nutrition
3
Meals On Wheels Ministry Inc

Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…

Food & Nutrition
4
Caritas of Austin

Caritas of austin provides a home and tailored services to prevent and end homelessness.

—
5
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
6
Family Promise of Midland Texas Inc

The mission of family promise of midland is to "end homelessness, one family at a time."

Housing & Shelter
7
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
8
The Texas International Institute of Health Professions

Provide comprehensive medical & dental services to low income uninsured families, provide

Education
9
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
10
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
11
People's Community Clinic Inc

The mission of people's community clinic is to improve the health of medically underserved and uninsured central texans by providing high quality, affordable health care with dignity and respect.

Health
12
Feeding the Lone Star Llc

Uniting volunteers to prepare meals that get delivered to the food insecure

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Academy 4; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $26,390 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUT AUSTIN-LITERACY FIRST: $17,500 · OtherUT AUSTIN-LITERACY FIRSTRAMJAANE JOSUA FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherRAMJAANE JOSUA FOUNDATIONAmerican Red Cross: $15,000 · OtherAmerican Red CrossTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Other+8 more: $29,800 · Other+8 moreINKIND INC: $27,000 · Human ServicesINKIND INCMEALS ON WHEELS: $3,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHE…MISSION POSSIBLE AUSTIN INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentRECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentGET UP PROJECT: $5,000 · InternationalTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $2,500 · Membership BenefitOPERATION GAME THIEF: $2,500 · AnimalsMORE THAN WELCOME INC: $2,500 · Religion
Other$213,690Human Services$30,000Youth Development$7,500International$5,000Membership Benefit$2,500Animals$2,500Religion$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINKIND INC: $27,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION POSSIBLE AUSTIN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGET UP PROJECT: $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $3,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION GAME THIEF: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMORE THAN WELCOME INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST DAVID'S FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INKIND INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MISSION POSSIBLE AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GET UP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION GAME THIEF ↗
  • Who funds MORE THAN WELCOME INC ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fara Foundation Formerly Known as Foundacion Fara funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fara Foundation Formerly Known as Foundacion Fara. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fara Foundation Formerly Known as Foundacion Fara’s filings →

    More from the funding graph