Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

FAR Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$926kEducation$435kReligion$162kYouth Development$99kHealth$57kInternational$27kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $177k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vine Maple Place$40,000
Boise Girls Academy$30,000
Novo$25,000
Redeemer Christian School$22,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Fall City Community Food Pantry$10,000
The Cove$10,000
Carepoint Clinic$10,000
Cole Valley Christian Schools$10,000
Tolt Congregational Church$5,000
Love Snoqualmie Valley$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $946k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The Cove: $10k → 9%Summit Assistance: $10k → 11%Sophia Way: $20k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $176k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $175k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $150k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $120k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $120k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $75k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $50k → 9%Vine Maple Place: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$296k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$1.6M
$214k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+12%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VINE MAPLE PLACE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $906k · revenue +75%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $212k · revenue +62%
  • CV
    COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MI
    Mercer Island Youth and Family Services
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • AA
    Auburn Academy
    one grant, 2019 · $35k
  • SO
    SERVING OTHERS WORLDWIDE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
2
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
3
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
4
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

5
Seattle Country Day School

Seattle country day school is an independent, coeducational school serving kindergarten through eighth grade, inspiring gifted children to reach their potential through inquiry, curiosity, and wonder.

Education
6
Spruce Street School

Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…

Education
7
Sun Valley Community School Inc

From our campus to the wilderness our mission is to inspire students to think critically engage confidently embrace challenges and lead impactful purposeful lives. Our primary program service is a PK-12th grade day boarding school in Sun…

Education
8
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
9
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

10
Valley Christian School System

In the light of the lordship of jesus christ and the authority of god's word, we will educate each unique student in cooperation with the christian community so that he or she is equipped and inspired to make a difference for jesus christ…

Education
11
Innovation Spokane Schools

To prepare a diverse range of students for a life of learning in post-secondary education, citizenship, and leadership.

Education
12
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Cove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VINE MAPLE PLACE — $906,000 · Human ServicesVINE MAPLE PLACE+3 more — $40,000 · Human ServicesNOVO MISSION INC — $75,000 · OtherNOVO MISSION INCMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP — $70,000 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIPCEDAR PARK ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $55,000 · OtherCEDAR PARK ASSEMBLY OF GODMercer Island Youth and Family Services — $50,000 · OtherMercer Island Youth and Family …Auburn Academy — $35,000 · OtherAuburn AcademyBoise Girls Academy — $30,000 · OtherBoise Girls AcademyIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSERVING OTHERS WORLDWIDE — $25,000 · OtherNORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $23,600 · OtherRedeemer Christian School — $22,000 · OtherNew Hope Church — $20,000 · Other+10 more — $91,000 · Other+10 moreSEATTLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $212,000 · EducationSEATTLE CHRISTIAN …COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $70,000 · EducationCOLE VALLEY CHRIST…Eastside Community School — $20,000 · EducationEastside Community…YOUNG LIFE — $49,000 · Youth DevelopmentCarePoint Clinic — $40,000 · HealthWORLD VISION INC — $2,000 · International
Human Services$946,000Other$526,600Education$302,000Youth Development$49,000Health$40,000International$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE — $906,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetSEATTLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $212,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCOLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $49,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCarePoint Clinic — $40,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSERVING OTHERS WORLDWIDE — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE SOPHIA WAY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEastside Community School — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COVE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetENCOMPASS NORTHWEST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COLE VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds CarePoint Clinic
  • Who funds SERVING OTHERS WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY
  • Who funds Eastside Community School
  • Who funds THE COVE
  • Who funds ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST
  • Who funds SUMMIT ASSISTANCE DOGS
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization FAR Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph