How much did FANNIE KRAFT FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of FANNIE KRAFT FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $33k
$10k–50k11 grants · $215k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$40,000
JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK$35,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$20,000
THE REGENTS AT UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - PROGRAM FOR NEUROLOGY RESEARCH$20,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$20,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MI FOUNDATION$20,000
BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$15,000
MIKE ILITCH SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$15,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR BLIND$10,000
THE JACQUELINE E BAYLEY FOUNDATION$10,000
YAD EZRA$7,500
ROEPER SCHOOL$6,000
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$5,000
GILDA'S CLUB$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 38% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$809k · 19 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$809k

$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-25%

+114%

Still filing today

37%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthReligionCivil RightsFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YE
YAD EZRA
5× · 2020–2024 · $33k · revenue +42%
GC
GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +60%
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
5× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +36%

Funded once

KIDS KICKING CANCER
one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +7%
LY
LUBAVITCH YESHIVA
one grant, 2021 · $5k
JD
JUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Karmanos Cancer Foundation

The karmanos cancer foundation's objective is to solicit, receive and distribute funds to the karmanos cancer institute, barbara ann karmanos cancer hospital and affiliated entities to engage in charitable, scientific, research, education,…

Health

Jewish Historical Society of

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—

Michigan State Medical Society

Promote a health care environment that supports physicians in caring for and enhancing the health of michigan citizens through science, quality, and ethics in the practice of medicine.

—

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

Michigan Cancer Society

To operate exclusively for the benefit of Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and transfer to it all amounts received to promote the control of cancer through programs of research, care, detection, prevention, and education.

Health

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Hospital

The barbara ann karmanos cancer hospital is dedicated to the delivery of cancer care services, the treatment and care of cancer patients and the prevention of cancer.

Health

Michigan Health & Hospital Association

To promote the interests of the health care industry.

—

American Kidney Fund Inc

We help people fight kidney disease and live healthier lives.

—

Mymichigan Health Foundation

To enhance the broad healthcare purpose of mymichigan health by raising funds and public support, and by funding mymichigan health services, programs, projects and initiatives that further the exempt purposes of mymichigan health and its…

Health

Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health

The Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research

Supporting research into the treatment and cure of adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Health

Institute for Applied Gerontology

The institute is dedicated to promoting access to evidence-based, specialist-level palliative care for patients and families coping with serious or advanced illness

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and the most unlike its peers is Gleaners Community Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/10

Grantees still filing

5/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$572,000Religion$150,000Health$131,000Civil Rights$27,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Animals$13,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FANNIE KRAFT FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 386067578 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 34% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Fannie Kraft Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fannie Kraft Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FANNIE KRAFT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fannie Kraft Foundation?

More from the funding graph

FANNIE KRAFT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fannie Kraft Foundation?

More from the funding graph