Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fannie C Hyde Testamentary Trust 1020025507

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$86k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Recreation & Sports$221kFood & Nutrition$144kEducation$141kPublic Safety & Disaster$103kYouth Development$83kHousing & Shelter$37kCommunity Improvement$22kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COBURN FREE LIBRARY$40,000
TIOGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY$23,100
CAMP AHWAGA ASSOCIATION$10,000
OWEGO ROTARY PROJECTS INC$7,771
TIOGA COUNTY RURAL MINISTRY$5,551
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%TIOGA COUNTY OPEN DOOR MISSION: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 11 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$711k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+29%

Still filing today

82%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TIOGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2026 · $144k · revenue +209%
  • CF
    Coburn Free Library
    5× · 2018–2026 · $120k · revenue +58%
  • TC
    TIOGA COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $83k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SCHOOLS OF BROOME COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TO
    TIOGA OPPORTUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tioga Fire Company No 1

Fire protection services to residents of tioga center, ny and the surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Tioga County Agricultural Association

Promotion of agriculture

Community Improvement
3
Tioga County Historical Society Inc

Tioga county historical society is an eduactional organization established to interpret the history of tioga county by collecting and preserving artifacts, operating a museum, conducting educational programs, publishing materials and…

—
4
Tioga County Development Corporation

Assists in the economic development of tioga county.

—
5
Tioga Volunteer Fire Company

To prevent and extinguish fires in the borough of tioga and surrounding area and to assist other fire fighting organizations

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Tioga Fire Department

None

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Ticonderoga Emergency Squad Inc

Volunteer ambulance service

Health
8
Tioga Ridge Runners Snowmobile Club Limited

Maintenance of 95 Miles of Trails

Community Improvement
9
Tioga Community Health Services Inc

Support of rural community health through programs, information and education.

Health
10
Tioga County Historical Society

Local historical education operation of a museum and provision of education relating to the history of tioga county pennsylvania

Arts & Culture
11
Saratoga Springs Fc
Recreation & Sports
12
Ontario County Historical Society

Provide various educational, cultural, and museum programs and services to area residents and tourists in order to promote an appreciation of ontario county, ny.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tioga County Open Door Mission of Owego Ny Inc; the most unlike its peers is Owego Hose Teams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Owego Little League Inc: $165,395 · Recreation & SportsOwego Little League IncTIOGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $143,790 · Recreation & SportsTIOGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY+1 more: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsCoburn Free Library: $120,000 · OtherCoburn Free LibraryOWEGO ROTARY PROJECTS INC: $22,077 · OtherOWEGO ROTARY PROJECTS INCCATHOLIC SCHOOLS OF BROOME COUNTY: $21,435 · OtherCATHOLIC SCHOOLS OF BROOME CO…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTioga County Rural Ministry Inc: $10,782 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · Other+2 more: $7,000 · OtherTIOGA COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $83,442 · Youth DevelopmentTIOGA COUNTY BOYS …CAMP AHWAGA ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP AHWAGA ASSOCI…OWEGO HOSE TEAMS: $75,000 · Public Safety & DisasterOWEGO HOSE…OWEGO EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $27,990 · HealthTIOGA OPPORTUNITIES INC: $16,760 · Housing & ShelterTIOGA COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INC TIOGA ARTS COUNCIL: $13,498 · Arts & CultureTIOGA COUNTY OPEN DOOR MISSION OF OWEGO NY INC: $8,000 · Human Services
Recreation & Sports$316,185Other$209,294Youth Development$128,442Public Safety & Disaster$75,000Health$27,990Housing & Shelter$16,760Arts & Culture$13,498Human Services$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOwego Little League Inc: $165,395 over 6y, 35% of budgetTIOGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $143,790 over 8y, 20% of budgetCoburn Free Library: $120,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetTIOGA COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $83,442 over 4y, 11% of budgetOWEGO HOSE TEAMS: $75,000 over 4y, 28% of budgetCAMP AHWAGA ASSOCIATION INC: $45,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetOWEGO EMERGENCY SQUAD INC: $27,990 over 2y, 62% of budgetTIOGA OPPORTUNITIES INC: $16,760 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIOGA COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INC TIOGA ARTS COUNCIL: $13,498 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetTioga County Rural Ministry Inc: $10,782 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTIOGA COUNTY OPEN DOOR MISSION OF OWEGO NY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Owego Little League Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIOGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Coburn Free Library ↗
  • Who funds TIOGA COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds OWEGO HOSE TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP AHWAGA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OWEGO EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds TIOGA OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TIOGA COUNTY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INC TIOGA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Tioga County Rural Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIOGA COUNTY OPEN DOOR MISSION OF OWEGO NY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hiawatha Soccer Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Floyd Hooker FoundationAK26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Floyd Hooker Foundation · The Tsb Foundation Inc · Truman Mildred Faulkner Foundation · Tioga Downs Regional Community Foundation Inc · Les Wagner Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fannie C Hyde Testamentary Trust 1020025507 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fannie C Hyde Testamentary Trust 1020025507. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fannie C Hyde Testamentary Trust 1020025507’s filings →

    More from the funding graph