Skip to content
Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc

Rhcn ensures nebraskans have equitable access to high quality sexual and reproductive health care through funding, education, advocacy, and facilitating statewide collaborations.

$4.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$17M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $558k
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.0M
$305,992
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND$1,024,640
ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$922,035
CHOICE FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC$482,154
FAMILY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER$410,353
PEOPLES FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC$373,611
THREE RIVERS PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT$305,992
WESTERN COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES$263,812
GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$252,048
MIDTOWN HEALTH CENTER$240,923
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA$233,641
MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$83,323
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $921k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $239k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $234k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $190k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $129k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $128k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 12 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$16M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +62%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +8%
  • CC
    CHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC
    one grant, 2025 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Peoples Community Health Clinic Inc

Dedicated to providing access to affordable, compassionate, high quality health care for all.

Health
3
Womens Hlth Serv of Eastern Ia Inc

Family planning and maternal health services.

Health
4
Physicians Clinic Inc

Methodist physicians clinic provides accessible, quality medical care through its integrated team of health professionals, including specialists in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery,…

Health
5
North Platte Nebraska Hospital Corp

To inspire health and healing by putting patients first -- always.

Health
6
Capitol City Family Health Center Inc

To provide quality, affordable health care to all.

Health
7
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
8
Greater Sioux Community Health Center Inc

The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.

Health
9
Jefferson Community Health Center Inc

Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.

Health
10
Community Clinic of Maui Inc

To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.

Health
11
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
12
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Western Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $1,700,150 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH SERVICESPEOPLES FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,295,985 · HealthPEOPLES FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,173,546 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $1,024,640 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INCMidtown Health Center: $1,023,988 · HealthMidtown Health CenterGOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $980,931 · HealthGOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $849,962 · HealthCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INCTHE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $785,490 · HealthTHE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $3,367,415 · OtherONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCCHOICE FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $2,043,940 · OtherCHOICE FAMILY HEALTH CARE INCCHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $1,132,626 · OtherCHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATIONTHREE RIVERS PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $1,121,044 · OtherTHREE RIVERS PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENTCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $920,609 · Human Services
Health$8,834,692Other$7,665,025Human Services$920,609

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $3,367,415 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHOICE FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $2,043,940 over 5y, 57% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH SERVICES: $1,700,150 over 5y, 40% of budgetPEOPLES FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,295,985 over 5y, 46% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,173,546 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $1,132,626 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $1,024,640 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetMidtown Health Center: $1,023,988 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $980,931 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA: $920,609 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $849,962 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $785,490 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Women's Fund of Great…Direct ReliefThe Sherwood Foundati…Amazonsmile Foundation
Women's Fund of Greater Omaha IncNE28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Women's Fund of Greater Omaha Inc · Direct Relief · The Sherwood Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Family Planning Council of Nebraska’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home