· Public charity
Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc
Rhcn ensures nebraskans have equitable access to high quality sexual and reproductive health care through funding, education, advocacy, and facilitating statewide collaborations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k3 grants · $558k
- $250k+8 grants · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND | $1,024,640 |
| ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC | $922,035 |
| CHOICE FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC | $482,154 |
| FAMILY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER | $410,353 |
| PEOPLES FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC | $373,611 |
| THREE RIVERS PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $305,992 |
| WESTERN COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES | $263,812 |
| GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $252,048 |
| MIDTOWN HEALTH CENTER | $240,923 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA | $233,641 |
| MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION | $83,323 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $921k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +41%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +8%- MHMidtown Health Center5× · 2021–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +23%
Funded once
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INCone grant, 2025 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Dedicated to providing access to affordable, compassionate, high quality health care for all.
Family planning and maternal health services.
Methodist physicians clinic provides accessible, quality medical care through its integrated team of health professionals, including specialists in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery,…
To inspire health and healing by putting patients first -- always.
To provide quality, affordable health care to all.
Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.
The mission of promise community health center is to provide accessible, holistic health care that adapts to the needs of the community to improve the wellbeing of all persons.
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.
To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Western Nebraska and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood of the Heartland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICE FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLES FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CHADRON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Midtown Health Center ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF WESTERN NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Women's Fund of Greater Omaha Inc · Direct Relief · The Sherwood Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc?
Find your warmest path to Family Planning Council of Nebraska Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.