Skip to content

· Private foundation

Falling Leaves Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Falling Leaves Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Falling Leaves Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $4M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
7
’18
4
’19
5
’20
2
’21
6
’22
8
’23
5
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$18MEducation$5.3MArts & Culture$332kCivil Rights$60kHealth$35kReligion$11kHuman Services$8kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.0M
$1,991
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION$3,955,590
OLIN T BINKLEY MEMORIAL BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
COMMITTEE OF 100$3,500
SEGERSTROM CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,991
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION$800
OLIVE CREST ABUSED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$500
NATIONAL CENTRALIZED REPOSITORY FOR ALZHEIMER'S$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HERITAGE POINTE: $1k → 10%Heritage Pointe: $1k → 10%Heritage Pointe: $1k → 10%HERITAGE POINTE: $1k → 10%HERITAGE POINTE: $1k → 10%Heritage Pointe: $1k → 10%Heritage Pointe: $600 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
KY
MD
AZ
NC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 16 repeat orgs$357k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
30

Total granted

$5.4M
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+26%

Still filing today

63%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +61%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $32k · revenue +237%
  • SC
    Segerstrom Center for the Arts
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • IW
    Imperial War Museum
    one grant, 2018 · $314k
  • TI
    THE IMC OF SACRED HEART CANOSSIAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
8
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $15,483,382 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $630,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $5,246,132 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA …+2 more: $4,000 · EducationFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,642,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $220 · Community ImprovementImperial War Museum: $314,191 · OtherUniversity of North Carolina: $25,000 · Other+33 more: $57,044 · OtherCOMMITTEE OF 100 INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $3,449 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $1,705 · Arts & CultureHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $31,706 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY: $6,600 · Human Services
Philanthropy$16,113,382Education$5,250,132Community Improvement$1,642,220Other$396,235Arts & Culture$71,154Health$32,706Human Services$6,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $15,483,382 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $5,246,132 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,642,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $630,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE OF 100 INC: $60,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $31,706 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY: $6,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $3,449 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDARROW SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVE CREST ABUSED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUTCHINS CONSORT: $800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $755 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE HUNTINGTON BEACH: $220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Symphony: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE OF 100 INC ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds DARROW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ABUSED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds THE HUTCHINS CONSORT ↗
  • Who funds PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Falling Leaves Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Falling Leaves Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Falling Leaves Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Falling Leaves Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Falling Leaves’ filings →

More from the funding graph