How much did FALL CREEK VALLEY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of FALL CREEK VALLEY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

noblesville

2020

unspecifiecnest

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500

Median grant

States reached

$500k

Total assets

Largest grants

INDIANAPOLIS HUMANE SOCIETY$4,000
USA SHOOTING$4,000
CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION$2,000
CLOPON'S SAFE HAVEN RESCUE$2,000
MARY'S PLACE$1,500
HUGS CAFE$1,500
CHILD RESCUE COOALITION$1,000
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTIN LEARNING INC$1,000
MAKE A WISH$1,000
SCHNELLVILLE FIREFIGHTING CORP$1,000
SATCHEL'S LAST RESORT$1,000
VENICE THEATER INC$1,000
PRESERVATION ASSN OF BEAVER ISLAND$500
FOSTER FAIRY INC$500
INDIANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$141k · 39 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +65% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$141k

$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%

+65%

Still filing today

59%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

US
USA SHOOTING
5× · 2019–2023 · $21k · revenue +22%
MP
MARY'S PLACE
5× · 2019–2023 · $12k · revenue +80%
HC
HUGS CAFE
5× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +737%

Funded once

CS
CLOPONS SAFE HAVEN RESCUE
one grant, 2020 · $2k
SN
SPARROW'S NEST OF THE HUDSON VALLEYgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +134%
BH
BUNKER HILL ELEMTARY SCHOOL PTO
one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Humane Society of the South Platte Valley Inc

HSSPV's mission is to be a leader in saving lives and serving communities by providing innovative care for animals, finding loving homes and reuniting families.

Animals

Laurels House

Laurel's House provides spay neuter and urgent care veterinary services for pets at no cost to their owners. Laurel's House also has equine wildlife and educational programs.

—

Spay Neuter Services of Indiana

Pet friendly services saves animal lives and prevents suffering. we provide free/low cost spay/neuter surgery certificates to animal shelters, rescue groups and limited-income families in all 92 indiana counties.

Animals

Felines Inc

Providing a safe and loving shelter to cats and dogs until their permanent adoptive home is found.

Animals

Brookings Regional Humane Society Inc

Brookings (South Dakota) Humane Society is an adoption center for dogs, cats and other small companion animals. BRHS supports the spaying and neutering of animals in order to prevent the overpopulation of unwanted animals all of our dogs…

Animals

Spartanburg Humane Society Inc

The mission of the Spartanburg Humane Society is to provide quality care tolost and unwanted pets while raising community awareness about issuesaffecting companion animals.

—

Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

SNAP prevents the suffering and death of companion animals and enriches the human animal bond.

Animals

Humane Society for Hamilton County

Humane Society for Hamilton County (HSHC) is saving lives, educating communities and completing families by providing a compassionate and healthy environment for the homeless animals of Hamilton County, Indiana, until they can be placed…

Animals

Hooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue and provide medical treatment for abused and abandoned animals; to rehabilitate rescued animals and find permanent placement in loving adoptive homes; to provide loving lifelong care at our sanctuary for those animals who are not…

Animals

Petconnect Rescue Inc

Petconnect rescue is a foster-based animal welfare organization dedicated to saving at-risk dogs and cats, providing them with high quality care, and adopting them to loving homes. we are committed to ensuring a highly positive rescue…

Animals

Dubois County Humane Society

To provide shelter and care for homeless and abandoned animals, to provide low cost pet spay/neuter certificates to residents of Dubois County and surrounding counties, to promote shelter animals to find permanent homes, and to investigate…

Animals

Bartholomew County Humane Society Inc

Humane treatment of stray dogs and cats

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Smith House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marys Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/37

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,528

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/35

Grantees still filing

28/35

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$112,250Youth Development$14,250Animals$13,750Human Services$12,250Health$6,000Food & Nutrition$5,500Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable TrustIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FALL CREEK VALLEY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PINNACLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832809750 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PINNACLE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Fall Creek Valley Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fall Creek Valley Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FALL CREEK VALLEY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fall Creek Valley Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

FALL CREEK VALLEY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Fall Creek Valley Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph