Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fairmount Park Conservancy

FAIRMOUNT PARK CONSERVANCY brings parks to life.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Community Improvement$912kPublic Benefit$898kEnvironment$182kArts & Culture$49kEducation$7kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $24,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $43,034 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,034 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELCOME AMERICA INC$17,000
FRIENDS OF MATTHIAS BALDWIN PARK$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%PHILADELPHIA PARKS ALLIANCE INC: $60k → 22%STRAWBERRY MANSION CDC: $170k → 22%STRAWBERRY MANSION CDC: $85k → 22%FRIENDS OF MATTHIAS BALDWIN PARK: $7k → 22%FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON: $21k → 22%FAIRMOUNT PARK TRUST FUNDS: $359k → 22%PHILADELPHIA PARKS & RECREATION: $325k → 22%FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $227k → 22%WELCOME AMERICA INC: $17k → 22%FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $60k → 22%WELCOME AMERICA INC: $17k → 22%RIVERFRONT NORTH PARTNERSHIP: $162k → 22%FRIENDS OF RYERSS AT BURHOLME: $8k → 22%CENTENNIAL PARKSIDE CDC: $85k → 22%CENTENNIAL PARK CDC: $85k → 22%MT AIRY USA: $12k → 22%CENTENNIAL PARK CDC: $85k → 22%FRIENDS OF PRETZEL PARK (MANAYUNK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL): $7k → 22%BARTRAM'S GARDENJOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION: $85k → 22%BARTRAM'S GARDEN: $85k → 22%BARTRAM'S GARDEN: $85k → 22%MEXICAN CULTURAL CENTER: $7k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$969k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$962k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+68%

Still filing today

100%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $255k · revenue +199%
  • CP
    CENTENNIAL PARKSIDE CDC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $255k · revenue +77% · 27% of their budget
  • WA
    WELCOME AMERICA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAIRMOUNT PARK TRUST FUNDS
    one grant, 2020 · $359k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $325k
  • DR
    DELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $162k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairmount Park Conservancy

Fairmount park conservancy brings parks to life. the conservancy works with the city of philadelphia and its communities to steward our parks and nurture our shared environment, cultural resources and public health. the conservancy leads…

Environment
2
Friends of the Rail Park

Friends of the rail park was founded to cultivate visions, advocate for, and ultimately manage a continous three-mile linear park and recreation path in philadelphia.

Environment
3
Schuylkill River Development Corporation

Srdc is revitalizing philadelphia's tidal schuylkill river corridor into an asset that connects neighborhoods and encourages investment. working with the city and stakeholders to build, maintain, and program schuylkill banks, srdc drives…

Community Improvement
4
Glen Foerd Conservation Corporation

Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…

Environment
5
Delaware River Waterfront Corporation

Drwc's mission is to maintain and promote the use and development of the city of philadelphia's waterfront. this task is of vital importance to the city and one which the city would otherwise be rquired to perform absent the drwc.

Community Improvement
6
Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.

Recreation & Sports
7
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
8
Elfreths Alley Association Inc

The misssion of the elfreth's alley association is to preserve and protect the elfreth's alley historic district, while interpreting the contributions of everday philadelphians to our american story.

9
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
10
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
11
Association for Public Art

The association for public art (apa, formerly the fairmount park art association) commissions, preserves, interprets and promotes public art in philadelphia. dedicated to creating a museum without walls that informs, engages and inspires…

Arts & Culture
12
Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation

The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Library of Philadelphia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Ryerss Library and Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAIRMOUNT PARK TRUST FUNDS — $359,437 · OtherFAIRMOUNT PARK TRUST FUNDSIndividual grant recipient — $325,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $287,000 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION — $255,000 · OtherTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION+3 more — $25,900 · OtherStrawberry Mansion Community Development Corporation — $255,000 · Community ImprovementStrawberry Mansion Community Developm…CENTENNIAL PARKSIDE CDC — $255,000 · Community ImprovementCENTENNIAL PARKSIDE CDCDELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATION — $162,390 · Community ImprovementDELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATIONPHILADELPHIA PARKS ALLIANCE INC — $60,000 · EnvironmentTHE FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC — $21,250 · EnvironmentWELCOME AMERICA INC — $34,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF RYERSS LIBRARY AND MUSEUM — $8,039 · Arts & CultureMEXICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $7,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,252,337Community Improvement$672,390Environment$81,250Arts & Culture$49,039

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $287,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION — $255,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetStrawberry Mansion Community Development Corporation — $255,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetCENTENNIAL PARKSIDE CDC — $255,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetDELAWARE RIVER CITY CORPORATION — $162,390 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA PARKS ALLIANCE INC — $60,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetWELCOME AMERICA INC — $34,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE WISSAHICKON INC — $21,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMT AIRY USA — $11,900 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEXICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $7,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fairmount Park Conservancy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph