Skip to content

· Private foundation

Factual Images Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$85kReligion$51kPhilanthropy$11kCivil Rights$8kEducation$6kHealth$4kArts & Culture$262Other$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
8
States reached
$323k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL$10,000
LOWER GALILEE ASSOCIATION$9,457
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS$3,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$2,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION STL$1,000
HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS$1,000
UNITED HEBREW SPIELDBERG ECC$750
TEMPLE EMANUEL$750
JEWISH STUDENT UNION ST LOUIS$750
SHAARE EMETH PRESCHOOL$750
KOL RINAH$750
Individual grant recipient$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $21k → 11%AMERICAN ISRAELI COUNCIL: $2k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS TZOFIM: $5k → 17%THE TORONTO CHEDER: $1k → 11%STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $20k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS: $3k → 17%STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $10k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS TZOFIM: $1k → 17%STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $1k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS TZOFIM: $1k → 17%STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $1k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 6%HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS: $2k → 17%STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $1k → 11%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $2k → 6%HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS: $1k → 17%HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS: $1k → 17%HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS: $1k → 17%HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS: $1k → 17%HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS: $1k → 17%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%BIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%BIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%BIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%JCC ECC: $2k → 11%JCC ECC: $2k → 11%JCC ECC: $2k → 11%JCC ECC: $2k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION STL: $1k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION STL: $1k → 11%KOL RINAH: $21k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION STL: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS KOLLEL: $1k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION STL: $1k → 11%KOL RINAH: $1k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION STL: $1k → 11%JEWISH FEDERATION STL: $1k → 11%JEWISH CHARITABLE SERVICES: $2k → 11%JEWISH CHARITABLE SERVICES: $2k → 11%JEWISH CHARITABLE SERVICES: $1k → 11%CHABAD OF WASHU: $1k → 11%CHABAD OF WASHU: $1k → 11%CHABAD OF WASHU: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Factual Images Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Factual Images Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 29 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
4

Total granted

$157k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +297%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +114%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAELI COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS KOLLEL
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • TT
    THE TORONTO CHEDER
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
4
Better Future for Israel

To strengthen israel's future in these areas: 1)providing new immigrants with assistance in a few key areas: representing them as they navigate government ministries and assisting them with their challenges as new immigrants to israel.…

Philanthropy
5
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
6
The Jerusalem Connection
—
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
9
Physicians for Palestine
Health
10
Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International
11
Novachai
Education
12
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Shaving Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOL RINAH: $23,500 · OtherKOL RINAHLOWER GALILEE ASSOCIATION: $9,457 · OtherLOWER GALILEE ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATIONJEWISH CHARITABLE SERVICES: $5,327 · OtherJEWISH CHARITABLE SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherBNAI AMOONA ROTSKOFF ECC: $3,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL: $3,000 · OtherSHAARE EMETH PRESCHOOL: $3,000 · Other+12 more: $16,832 · Other+12 moreSTUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $54,000 · InternationalSTUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAELJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $11,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) IN…FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INCBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $4,000 · International+3 more: $3,400 · InternationalHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $7,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1,620 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationJewish Federation of St Louis: $6,000 · PhilanthropyGATEWAY TO HOPE: $2,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,500 · HealthSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $1,200 · ReligionAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $900 · Civil Rights
Other$84,616International$82,900Education$8,820Philanthropy$6,000Health$3,500Religion$1,200Civil Rights$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL: $54,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY TO HOPE: $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1,620 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHAVING ISRAEL: $1,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STUDENTS SUPPORTING ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SCOUTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HASBARA FELLOWSHIPS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY TO HOPE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds SHAVING ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH ISRAEL CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds READ TO A CHILD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Factual Images Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Factual Images Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Factual Images Trust?

Find your warmest path to Factual Images Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Factual Images’ filings →

More from the funding graph