Skip to content

· Private foundation

Faber Future Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$377kPhilanthropy$306kCivil Rights$228kReligion$99kHealth$95kEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION NORTHERN NJ$25,000
SUNRISE ASSOCAITION$20,000
UJA FEDERATION NEW YORK$15,015
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$10,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$2,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$1,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 9%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%TIDEWELL HISPICE: $500 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 9%CHARITY NAVAGATOR: $250 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 9%CHARITY NAVAGATOR: $250 → 7%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $75k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $500 → 6%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$947k · 28 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
35

Total granted

$947k
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+32%

Still filing today

64%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $240k · revenue +38%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +86%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    5× · 2019–2025 · $45k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH JERSEY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • GD
    GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
5
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Morgan Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
26/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $150,000 · OtherAMERICAN DEFAMATION LEAGUEWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $95,000 · OtherWORLD JEWISH CONGRESSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $75,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEUJA FEDERATION NEW YORK: $45,015 · OtherUJA FEDERATION NEW YORKSUNRISE ASSOCAITION: $45,000 · OtherSUNRISE ASSOCAITIONJEWISH FEDERATION: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION NORTHERN NJ: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH JERSEY: $25,000 · Other+39 more: $180,000 · Other+39 moreSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $240,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIAT…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cros…+5 more: $17,850 · Human Services+5 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SMILES FOR SCOTT FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $45,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 · Civil RightsBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $45,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · HealthCANDLELIGHTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $5,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $3,500 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationCITY HARVEST INC: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $1,200 · Food & Nutrition
Other$665,015Human Services$282,850Philanthropy$63,500Civil Rights$60,000Health$58,600Education$35,000Food & Nutrition$31,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $240,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANDLELIGHTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MORGAN CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELAINE KAUFMAN CULTURAL CENTER LUCY MOSES SCHOOL FOR MUSIC AND DANCE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SMILES FOR SCOTT FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCharity Navigator: $2,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDEWELL HOSPICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-BORO VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Faber Future Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Faber Future Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Tidewell Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Faber Future Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Faber Future Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Faber Future’s filings →

More from the funding graph