Skip to content

· Public charity

Evolve Houston

Improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by supporting and enabling the greater houston area to increase ev adoption.

$555k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Community Improvement$113kEnvironment$110kEmployment$45kEducation$30kHuman Services$27kReligion$25kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $215,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $555,146 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $340,146 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS SOURTHERN UNIVERSITY$30,000
HUE TECHNOLOGY$15,000
WOLD WIDE BARRIER BREAKERS$15,000
FRIENDS OF COLUMIA TAP$15,000
IVY LEAF FARMS$15,000
GREATER FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$15,000
SCOTTY'S BIKES$15,000
DRINKICKS$15,000
GROW$15,000
EIGHT MILLION STORIES INC$15,000
HYPE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC$15,000
SUMN$15,000
ALLIANCE FOR MULTICUTURAL COMMUNITY$10,000
HARLEM CLARKE FORT BEND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SOUTH UNION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 4 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +354% since the first grant, against +69% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$99k
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+354%
+69%

Still filing today

0%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTH AMERICA REAL ESTATE COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k
  • G
    GROW
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +354%

Funded once

  • RE
    RYDE ENTERPRISES
    one grant, 2023 · $86k
  • CO
    COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON- DOWNTOWN
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Education Culture Opportunities Foundation

The eco foundation works collaboratively with the people we serve to provide education, healthy food, and employment opportunities, so they can meet their needs today and thrive for generations to come

Human Services
2
Metro Equity Collabotrative

To provide education and resources to minority operated businesses

Education
3
The Social Engineering Project

The Social Engineering Project, Inc. TSEP is an Oakland based, 501c3 tax exempt social impact venture with Stanford University designed to address the lack of diversity in the tech industry through culturally relevant STEM pipeline…

Education
4
American Stem Alliance

To promote, support and foster initiatives within the hispanic community relating to education achievements in the areas of science thechnoloby, engineering and math

Education
5
Afri-Soul Education Center

Community development

Education
6
Softstack Factory

The specific purpose for which the Corporation is organized is to provide learning pathways like intensive software training that enable more individuals to participate as developers in the digital economy.

—
7
Institute for Global Education Equality of Opportunity and Prosperity Inc
Education
8
Unity Economic Development Corp

The mission of uedc includes the administration of programs and sevices designed to improve the lives of underserved populations by providing economic empowerment, housing and employment services, and education and community programs…

—
9
South Bureau Ministerial Alliance

To provide to the Youth in Lower Communities education college preparation Life Skills and Youth Unification

Human Services
10
Code for Miami Inc

Supporting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion through open and transparent governments. Building infrastructures connecting people, businesses, and non-profits through localized data. Equipping institutions and communities with modern tools…

—
11
Elevated Community Development Corporation

Training and jobs for exoffenders

Employment
12
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc

Environmental Justice & Equality

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edison Arts Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coalition of Community Organizations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RYDE ENTERPRISES: $86,432 · OtherRYDE ENTERPRISESNORTH AMERICA REAL ESTATE COUNCIL: $27,000 · OtherNORTH AMERICA REAL ESTATE COUNCILGROW: $25,000 · OtherGROWALLIANCE FOR MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICESHARLEM CLARKE FORT BEND: $22,000 · OtherHARLEM CLARKE FORT BENDIVY LEAF FARMS: $15,000 · OtherDRINKICKS: $15,000 · OtherWORLDWIDE BARRIER BREAKERS: $15,000 · OtherSUMN: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF COLUMBIA TAP: $15,000 · OtherHUE TECHNOLOGY: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON- DOWNTOWN: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · Other+2 moreTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $30,000 · EducationTEXAS SOUTHE…HYPE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationHYPE FREEDOM…EIGHT MILLION STORIES INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $15,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER FIRST MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $15,000 · ReligionEDISON ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH UNION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC SOUTH UNION CDC: $12,000 · Human Services
Other$310,432Education$45,000Youth Development$15,000Community Improvement$15,000Religion$15,000Arts & Culture$12,000Human Services$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHYPE FREEDOM SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEIGHT MILLION STORIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEDISON ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Houston Endowment IncTX19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Houston Endowment Inc · Houston Texans Foundation · The Methodist Hospital · United Way of Greater Houston · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evolve Houston funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evolve Houston. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Evolve Houston?

    Find your warmest path to Evolve Houston through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Evolve Houston’s filings →

    More from the funding graph