· Private foundation
Evolve Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $230k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILITARY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC | $300,000 |
| NW LOUISIANA FOOD BANK | $180,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF LA | $50,000 |
| Accelerate Change | $25,000 |
| VoteRiders | $25,000 |
| Working America's Education Fund | $25,000 |
| Imagine NC First | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL PARKS & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF LOUISIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING | $10,000 |
| SHREVEPORT OPERA | $10,000 |
| MCNEILL SREET PUMPING STATION PRESERVATION SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| ROY'S KIDS | $5,000 |
| MUSEUM OF BIBLICAL ART | $5,000 |
| B'NAI ZION CONGREGATION | $5,000 |
| EKWOK VILLAGE COUNCIL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OMOuachita Mountains Biological Station4× · 2017–2020 · $415k · revenue +27% · 83% of their budget
- AUAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE5× · 2017–2021 · $123k · revenue +103%
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION7× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- UUSAHELLOgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +175%
- LALouisiana Architecture Foundationone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -53%
- NLNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANKone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…
To research and develop centrist policy ideas.
To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
Free press action fund fights for your rights to connect and communicate. we fight to save the free and open internet, curb runaway media consolidation, protect press freedom, and promote digital civil rights. we believe that change…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…
The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.
Expose the harms posed by fossil-fuel and monopoly utility interests to ratepayers and the environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ouachita Mountains Biological Station. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILITARY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ouachita Mountains Biological Station ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ATHEISTS INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Miracle of Pentecost Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds STRONG TOWNS ↗
- Who funds MCNEILL STREET PUMPING STATION PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROYS KIDS ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT VOLUNTEER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds USAHELLO ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT OPERA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Louisiana Architecture Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE NORTH CAROLINA FIRST ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds VOTERIDERS ↗
- Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LOUISIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · The William B Wiener Jr Foundation · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Park Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Powers Foundation Inc · Zadeck Family Foundation · The Alta and John Franks Foundation · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Baton Rouge Area Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Evolve Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Evolve Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Evolve Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.