· Public charity
Every Eligible American
The organizations primary mission is to support policies that strengthen participation in democracy, educate the public on the crucial role of secretaries of state in protecting voting rights, and shine a light on those working to roll back election access.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OHIO PROGRESSIVE COLLABORATIVE | $500,000 |
| ONE PERSON ONE VOTE | $150,000 |
| EVERY ELIGIBLE NEVADAN | $50,000 |
| AMERICA VOTES | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact
To support legal, political & administrative efforts to protect fair voting.
Support "yes" vote on referendum dealing with national popular vote
To strengthen democracy in the United States through an assessment of US voting systems and US election administration from the perspective of global best practices.
Democracy for America Advocacy Fund (DFA-AF) is a 501(c)(4) organization that advocates for fair, just, inclusive, and equitable public policies that benefit all, not just a few. DFA-AF was launched to take on structural democracy reform…
Securing reforms to the electoral count act
The league of women voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…
Non-PartisanVoter Educ Advocacy
Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.
Informed and educated the public and lawmakers about the benefits of including independent voters in Pennsylvania's primary elections.
Conduct digital, direct mail and other public communication campaigns to support voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Value the Vote and the most unlike its peers is One Person One Vote. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALUE THE VOTE ↗
- Who funds FORWARD ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds WAY TO WIN ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds One Person One Vote ↗
- Who funds Ohio Progressive Collaborative ↗
- Who funds END CITIZENS UNITED LET AMERICA VOTE ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTH FUND ↗
- Who funds NEVADA ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds America Votes ↗
- Who funds BATTLE BORN PROGRESS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Hopewell Fund · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Tides Advocacy · Grove Action Fund · Global Impact Social Welfare Fund · Advocacy Action Fund Inc · The Heising-Simons Action Fund · Strategic Victory Fund · Women Donors Network Action
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Every Eligible American funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Every Eligible American?
Find your warmest path to Every Eligible American through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.