· Private foundation
Evernham Family - Racing For A Reason
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $142k
- $250k+2 grants · $547k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Autism Society of NC | $296,655 |
| Novant Health Foundation | $250,000 |
| Speedway Children's Charities | $82,000 |
| Motor Racing Outreach | $60,000 |
| The Dale Jr Foundation | $24,000 |
| Davidson Day School | $12,500 |
| Victory Junction | $10,000 |
| Motorsports Charities Inc | $10,000 |
| Hendrick Family Foundation | $10,000 |
| Audrain Automobile Museum Inc | $10,000 |
| Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum | $10,000 |
| Rescue Ranch | $7,500 |
| Sierra Delta | $5,000 |
| Jimmie Johnson Foundation | $5,000 |
| Joey Logano Foundation Inc | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $231k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +41%- SCSPEEDWAY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES6× · 2018–2025 · $208k · revenue +24%
- RMRonald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $200k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- DTDrive Toward a Cureone grant, 2024 · $11k
- BTBREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +31%
- FOFRIENDS OF LAGUNA SECAone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
To reverse the underfunded and under-researched nature of brain cancer by funding innovative research on the most aggressive forms of brain cancer - glioblastoma (gbm).
To improve business conditions in the sport of drag racing and in the hot rod industry, and promote and advance the common business interests of those engaged in the sport of drag racing and the hot rod industry, to promote safety,…
To support programs that positively enrich the lives of children throughout the United States.
Accelerate the discovery of drugs to prevent, treat and cure alzheimer's disease and related dementias.
Our mission is to improve the quality of life for children with pediatric brain tumors& other childhood cancers . the organization pairs children with college & high schoolathletic teams & nascar drivers who provide love, support and…
The adenoid cystic carcinoma research foundation (accrf) supports research into adenoid cystic carcinoma that will accelerate the development of improved therapies and a cure for the disease.
The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.
To leave ironman's legacy through philanthropy, volunteerism and grant making; by supporting various athletic, community, education, health, human services and public benefit non-profit organizations around the world.
The foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life for children with cancer and their families by providing financial assistance and compassionate support programs while advocating for increased research funds and raising public…
The mission of the lvh foundation is to provide funding to endow a professorship of als at duke university - not only to help those today with als, but more importantly to fund a cure for als in the future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victory Junction Gang Camp Inc and the most unlike its peers is Brad Keselowskis Checkered Flag Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds SPEEDWAY CHILDREN'S CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds Motor Racing Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds MARTIN TRUEX JR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPRINT CAR HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DALE JR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESCUE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds MOTORSPORTS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Davidson Day School ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS MOTOR SPEEDWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA DELTA INC ↗
- Who funds Jeff Gordon Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds JIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAKE NORMAN HUMANE INC ↗
- Who funds VICTORY JUNCTION GANG CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds DENNY HAMLIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds AUDRAIN AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LAGUNA SECA ↗
- Who funds Hendrick Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Joey Logano Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PUT ON THE BRAKES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAMANTHA AND KYLE BUSCH BUNDLE OF JOY FUND ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIFTY PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HELO INC ↗
- Who funds MANTEGNA FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KYLE PETTY CHARITY RIDE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hendrick Family Foundation · Motorsports Charities Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Dale Jr Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Kevin Harvick Foundation · Apex Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities · Joey Logano Charitable Foundation Inc · Jimmie Johnson Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Synchrony Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Evernham Family - Racing For A Reason funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Hollydell Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.