Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Evergreen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Science & Tech$67kEducation$38kReligion$20kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$3kYouth Development$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$2,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIT$27,000
AUGUSTA LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,700
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$3,000
ISD 197$2,400
TWO RIVERS DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$2,000
2ND HARVEST HEARTLAND$200
ARBOR FUND TIMBER HILLS$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $3k → 14%PADRAIG'S PLACE: $250 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$128k · 6 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$128k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-20%
0%

Still filing today

17%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MIT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $67k
  • I1
    ISD 197
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k
  • AL
    AUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $20k

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +91%
  • TR
    TWO RIVERS BOYS BASKETBALL BOOSTER CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • HS
    HENRY SIBLEY DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Grocers Association

The minnesota grocers association advances the common interest of those engaged in all aspects of the food industry of mn as a leadership resource. the mga encourages and sponsors educational seminars, conventions and fosters the exchange…

2
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
3
Northland College

Northland college's mission is to integrate undergraduate liberal arts studies with an environmental emphasis, enabling those it serves to address the challenges of the future.

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
College of St Scholastica Inc

Shaped by the catholic benedictine heritage, the college of st. scholastica provides intellectual and moral preparation for responsible living and meaningful work. in conjunction with this mission statement, the college's vision statement…

Education
6
The Great Northern Winter Festival

The great northern celebrates our cold, creative winters through ten days of diverse programming that invigorate mind and body. in an era of changing climate that threatens our signature season, we seek to create community, inspire action,…

Arts & Culture
7
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
8
The Minikahda Club

The members shall preserve, protect, promote and pass on the minikahda club legacy, traditions, and values and adapt and prepare for the future with sound financial management.

9
Second Harvest Northland

End hunger together in NE Minnesota and NW Wisconsin.

10
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

12
Duluth Cross Country Ski Club

Promote health through skiing

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota and the most unlike its peers is Padraigs Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIT — $67,000 · OtherMITISD 197 — $21,650 · OtherISD 197AUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCH — $19,800 · OtherAUGUSTANA LUTHERAN CHURCHWEST ST PAUL-MENDOTA HEIGHTS-EAGAN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 197 — $11,500 · OtherWEST ST PAUL-MENDOTA HEIGHTS-EAGAN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 197DEER LAKE ASSOCIATION — $6,500 · Other+9 more — $4,800 · OtherSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $3,000 · Food & NutritionWHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF — $300 · Food & NutritionLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $3,000 · Human ServicesPADRAIGS PLACE — $250 · Human ServicesGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Community ImprovementGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE — $1,550 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGE — $500 · EducationCAMP ODAYIN — $500 · Recreation & SportsMINNESOTA DEER HUNTERS ASSOCIATION — $200 · Recreation & SportsNORTHERN LIGHTS NORDIC SKI CLUB INCORPORATED — $200 · Youth Development
Other$131,250Food & Nutrition$3,300Human Services$3,250Community Improvement$3,000Education$2,050Recreation & Sports$700Youth Development$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE — $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP ODAYIN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA DEER HUNTERS ASSOCIATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE
  • Who funds CAMP ODAYIN
  • Who funds WHITE BEAR AREA FOOD SHELF
  • Who funds PADRAIGS PLACE
  • Who funds MINNESOTA DEER HUNTERS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds NORTHERN LIGHTS NORDIC SKI CLUB INCORPORATED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Evergreen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Evergreen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Evergreen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph