Skip to content

· Private foundation

Everard Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$340k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MYouth Development$108kHealth$55kHousing & Shelter$30kScience & Tech$19kHuman Services$4kPublic Benefit$596Civil Rights$405Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $290k
$1,136
Median grant
5
States reached
$274k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGENERATION CHURCH$201,500
RIVER OF LIFE$88,500
C3 PALM SPRINGS CHURCH$43,000
TEEN CHALLENGE$5,000
HOME PRODUCTS INC$1,136
VINE MAPLE PLACE$608
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$116
Individual grant recipient$50
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $80 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $71 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $66 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $36 → 14%WOUNDED WORRIOR PROJECT: $30 → 14%WOUNDED WORRIOR PROJECT: $30 → 14%WOUNDED WORRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $2k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $2k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $1k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $781 → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $650 → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $608 → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $600 → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $400 → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $100 → 9%ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
MI
NY
IA
OH
CA
KY
KS
TN
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +65% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
35

Total granted

$1.6M
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+65%

Still filing today

17%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsReligionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VINE MAPLE PLACE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +75%
  • SF
    SALEM FAMILY MINISTRIES INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +12%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $388 · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • IN
    IFC NW ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2021 · $41k
  • PS
    PALM SPRING CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • EI
    EMILY IRS MC CRAIGIE
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
2
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
3
Seattle Area Feline Rescue Fka Animal Talk Rescue

Safe rescue saves feline lives by taking in homeless cats, giving them the care they need, finding them loving homes, and supporting their human companions. we do this because we believe each cat has inherent value and that humans and…

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
6
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
7
Silicon Valley Pet Project

Silicon valley pet project (svpp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to saving local at-risk shelter pets through rescue, community involvement and education.

Animals
8
Humane Society of the South Platte Valley Inc

HSSPV's mission is to be a leader in saving lives and serving communities by providing innovative care for animals, finding loving homes and reuniting families.

Animals
9
Animal Shelter of Wood River Valley Dba Mountain Humane

We are on a mission to change lives by connecting pets and people. We dothis through innovative programs that inspire and have impact beyond ourborders. We envision a compassionate community where all animals arerecognized for their…

Animals
10
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
11
Kitsap Humane Society

Providing positive life changing solutions to people and animals in need.

Animals
12
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Cancer Research Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

C3 PALM SPRINGS CHURCH: $497,387 · OtherC3 PALM SPRINGS CHURCHRIVER OF LIFE: $294,503 · OtherRIVER OF LIFERIVER OF LIFE CHURCH: $277,136 · OtherRIVER OF LIFE CHURCHREGENERATION CHURCH: $203,000 · OtherREGENERATION CHURCHROCK CHURCH: $128,000 · OtherROCK CHURCH+44 more: $251,397 · Other+44 moreVINE MAPLE PLACE: $7,239 · Human ServicesANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $1,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $388 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $1,893 · Housing & ShelterCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,020 · PhilanthropyAUBURN VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 · AnimalsSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $25 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $25 · AnimalsStreetlife Ministries: $120 · Religion
Other$1,651,423Human Services$8,627Housing & Shelter$1,893Philanthropy$1,020Animals$200Religion$120

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $7,239 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSALEM FAMILY MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC: $1,893 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $1,020 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $388 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VINE MAPLE PLACE ↗
  • Who funds SALEM FAMILY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND ↗
  • Who funds ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Everard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Everard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Everard Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Everard Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Everard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph