Skip to content

· Private foundation

Evans Gordon W Charitable Tr

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Arts & Culture$291kEducation$47kYouth Development$11kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$473k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA$17,500
MARK ARTS$7,500
EXPLORATION PLACE$5,000
MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP$5,000
WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA$5,000
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,200
WICHITA CHAMBER CHORALE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEWMAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 16%NEWMAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 16%NEWMAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA: $18k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA: $18k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA: $16k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $16k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $10k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $10k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $10k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $10k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $10k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA: $10k → 16%MUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $8k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA: $5k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $4k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $4k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA: $4k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $4k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $4k → 16%WICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA: $4k → 16%CHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KS: $8k → 16%CHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%CHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%CHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN: $5k → 16%CHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%CHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%EXPLORATION PLACE: $5k → 16%MARK ARTS: $8k → 16%MARK ARTS: $7k → 16%MARK ARTS WICHITA KS: $6k → 16%MARK ARTS WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%MARK ARTS: $5k → 16%MARK ARTS WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%MARK ARTS: $5k → 16%MARK ARTS WICHITA KS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$337k · 12 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$337k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+108%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA
    4× · 2023–2026 · $61k · revenue +66%
  • MA
    MARK ARTS INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $25k · revenue +70%
  • NU
    NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $13k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CM
    Chamber Music At The Barn Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0% · 85% of their budget
  • WS
    WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY ULRICH MUSEUM OF ART WICHITA KS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • WS
    WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF FINE ARTS WICHITA KS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Musical Theater Southwest

MTS aims to ignite the lifelong love of performing arts and promote valuing creativity, community, and artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
2
Musical Theatre Works

Mucical Theatre Works (MTW) is a theater academy and performance organization. WTW provides participatory experience for students to produce two full-scale musicals each year.

Arts & Culture
3
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
4
Music Theatre of Ct Inc

Music theatre of connecticut, inc., was formed to foster and promote the growth and appreciation of theatre to the general public and to teach the appreciation of cultural and artistic values and benefits of theatre through production and…

—
5
Music Theater of Wenatchee Inc

The mission of Music Theatre of Wenatchee, a volunteer, non-profit organization incorporated under Washington state law, is to provide quality, live theatrical entertainment for the community from concept to performance, to provide…

Arts & Culture
6
Musical Theater Center

The musical theater center's mission is to share the joy of children's theater with many diverse audiences. it strives to be a positive force in the community by providing exceptional musical theater stage productions made up entirely of…

Arts & Culture
7
Wichita Children's Theatre Inc

To provide educational programs to children in the community with regard to performing arts.

Arts & Culture
8
Midwest Young Artists

Mission of MYA is to build a home with the power of music to enrich the lives of the students and their communities.

Arts & Culture
9
Music Theatre Kansas City Inc

Musical performance & youth education

Arts & Culture
10
Music Theatre of Idaho Inc

To provide cultural opportunities to under represented audiences in SW Idaho

Arts & Culture
11
Millwald Theatre Inc

The mission of the millwald theatre is to be a cultural hub that provides exceptional and accessible arts experiences including entertainment, education, and civic dialogue while promoting economic growth in our community.

Arts & Culture
12
Wichita Repertory Theater Inc

To provide theater peforming arts opportunities in wichita, kansas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Music Theatre Wichita; the most unlike its peers is Newman University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KS: $65,500 · OtherMUSIC THEATRE OF WICHITA WICHITA KSCHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KS: $28,000 · OtherCHAMBER MUSIC AT THE BARN WICHITA KSMARK ARTS WICHITA KS: $27,500 · OtherMARK ARTS WICHITA KSWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KS: $26,000 · OtherWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA KSMUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $19,500 · OtherMUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLEWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITA: $17,000 · OtherWICHITA SYMPHONY SOCIETY WICHITAWICHITA CHAMBER-CHORALE INC: $11,000 · OtherWICHITA CHAMBER-CHORALE INC+4 more: $10,200 · OtherMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $60,500 · Arts & CultureMUSIC THEATRE WICHITAMARK ARTS INC: $24,500 · Arts & CultureMARK ARTS INCEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureEXPLORATION PLACE INC+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $33,600 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIV…NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $13,000 · EducationNEWMAN UNIVERSITY …MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationMUSIC YOUTH PARTNE…
Other$204,700Arts & Culture$91,000Education$57,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $60,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $33,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $24,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $19,500 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetChamber Music At The Barn Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 85% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC THEATRE FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chamber Music At The Barn Inc ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FORUM THEATRE COMPANY WICHITA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

K T Wiedemann Foundation IncKS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Koch Family Foundation · Charitable Foundation Inc · Annie Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evans Gordon W Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evans Gordon W Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Evans Gordon W Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph