Skip to content
Evangelical Community Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Evangelical Community Hospital

We provide exceptional healthcare, accessible to all, in the safest and most compassionate atmosphere possible.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$423kFood & Nutrition$198kEducation$180kPublic Safety & Disaster$112kPhilanthropy$88kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$30kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $261,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $297,745 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$314M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREAMCATCHER FARM EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH$100,000
MIFFLINBURG HOSE CO NO 1$50,000
FIRST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF PA$32,000
LEWISBURG DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP$25,000
TRANSITIONS OF PA$15,000
HUMMELS WHARF FIRE CO$12,000
THE MILLER CENTER FOR RECREATION AND WELLNESS$11,000
GREEN DRAGON FOUNDATION$10,000
COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $15k → 11%TRANSITIONS OF PA: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$408k · 5 repeat orgs$576k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$408k
$553k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DF
    DREAMCATCHER FARM EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $198k · revenue -50% · 98% of their budget
  • MH
    MIFFLINBURG HOSE COMPANY #1
    2× · 2024–2025 · $90k · revenue 0%
  • LD
    LEWISBURG DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • EC
    EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $373k · 100% of their budget
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +10%
  • SA
    SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
2
Community Fire Company of Cornwall Borough

Volunteer firefighting

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Muhlenberg Area Ambulance Association

To provide emergency medical services to the berks county communities.

Health
4
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
5
Crawford Heritage Community Foundation

A community foundation established to provide a framework for charitable giving to local worthy causes in crawford county, pennsylvania.

Philanthropy
6
Central Pennsylvania July 4TH Inc

Central pennsylvania july 4th, inc is a non-profit organization comprimised of a team of volunteers and sponsors dedicated to celebrating america's independence with a day of family fun and the best all-volunteer fireworks display in the…

Education
7
Breathe Pennsylvania

Breathe pennsylvania's mission is to empower western pennsylvanians to breathe better and live healthier through education and awareness of lung health in our community.

Health
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Erie Community Foundation

The erie community foundation works to improve the quality of life for all in our region by evaluating and addressing community issues, building permanent charitable endowments, and by promoting philanthropic and community leadership.

Philanthropy
10
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
11
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
12
Chester County Community Foundation

The chester county community foundation connects people who care with the causes that matter, so their philanthropy makes a difference now and forever.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Giving Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Miller Center for Recreation and Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $373,010 · HealthEVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncDREAMCATCHER FARM EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH: $198,000 · Food & NutritionDREAMCATCHER FARM ED…MIFFLINBURG HOSE COMPANY #1: $90,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMIFFLINBUR…The Hummels Wharf Fire Company Incorporated: $12,000 · Public Safety & DisasterThe Hummel…THE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC: $40,000 · EducationTHE BLOOMS…THE GREEN DRAGON FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationTHE GREEN …PUBLIC LIBRARY FOR UNION COUNTY: $20,000 · EducationPUBLIC LIB…FIRST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60,500 · PhilanthropyFIRST COM…COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $27,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $50,000 · OtherSELINSGROVE AR…WILLIAM CAMERON ENGINE COMPANY OF LEWISBURG PA: $10,000 · OtherWILLIAM CAMERO…Warrior Run Community Education Foundation: $30,000 · OtherWarrior Run Co…TRANSITIONS OF PA: $30,000 · OtherTRANSITIONS OF…THE MILLER CENTER FOR RECREATION AND WELLNESS: $11,000 · OtherTHE MILLER CEN…GIRLS ON THE RUN MID STATE PA: $10,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE R…LEWISBURG DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Health$423,010Food & Nutrition$198,000Public Safety & Disaster$102,000Education$100,000Philanthropy$87,500Other$141,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEVANGELICAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $373,010 over 1y, 100% of budgetDREAMCATCHER FARM EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH: $198,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetMIFFLINBURG HOSE COMPANY #1: $90,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetFIRST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION PARTNERSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA: $60,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWISBURG DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetTHE BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GREEN DRAGON FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetWarrior Run Community Education Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTRANSITIONS OF PA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC LIBRARY FOR UNION COUNTY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWILLIAM CAMERON ENGINE COMPANY OF LEWISBURG PA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MID STATE PA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Community Found…Ppl FoundationDegenstein Charitable…Community Giving Foun…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
First Community Foundation Partnership of PennsylvaniaPA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · Ppl Foundation · Degenstein Charitable Foundation · Community Giving Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evangelical Community Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evangelical Community Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Evangelical Community Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home