Skip to content

· Private foundation

Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$116k
Granted FY2020
21
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$89kHealth$76kHuman Services$67kInternational$14kEducation$12kPhilanthropy$100Other$0
02FY2020 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k17 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO$18,362
DORCUS'S HOPE FOR GIRLS FOUNDATION$15,500
REAL LIFE MINISTRIES$12,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
SADDLEBACK CHURCH$7,500
CHILDERN'S VILLAGE$7,500
ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION$5,000
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CHRISTIAN SC$5,000
ARIZONA CHILDREN ASSOCIATION$5,000
INTERNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE INC$5,000
LAKE CITY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$2,500
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $5k → 15%ARIZONA CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $3k → 15%ARIZONA CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $3k → 15%ARIZONA CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%CHILDERN'S VILLAGE: $8k → 10%CHILDERN'S VILLAGE: $6k → 10%CHILDERN'S VILLAGE: $5k → 10%CHILDERN'S VILLAGE: $2k → 10%TESH INC: $2k → 10%TESH INC: $2k → 10%TESH INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
CA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$249k · 17 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$249k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
-18%

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $52k · revenue +22%
  • CV
    CANOPY VILLAGE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +210%
  • THE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • FC
    FAITH CHURCH LUTHERAN
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • KH
    KOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
Mt Hood Hospice

It is the mission of Mt. Hood Hospice to provide an independent, community-based program of care for terminally ill patients and their loved ones that emphasizes dignity, comfort and choices for quality of life, regardless of the ability…

—
3
Northland Hospice

We are a team of professionals striving to prepare our patients and families for the end of life experience. we support the patient, family, and friends in facing challenges of a life limiting illness by offering physical, emotional, and…

Human Services
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Hospice of Reno County Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support and care for the terminally ill, families, and others through all phases of an illness so that they may live as fully and as…

Human Services
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
8
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
9
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Foundation

To fund research to discover cures and more effective treatments for neuroendocrine cancers. the netrf is committed to improving the lives of those affected by neuroendocrine cancer by providing information & educational resources.

Health
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; the most unlike its peers is Arizona's Children Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $51,862 · OtherHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INCREAL LIFE MINISTRIES: $39,000 · OtherREAL LIFE MINISTRIESTHE SALVATION ARMY: $27,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDORCUS HOPE FOR GIRLS FOUNDATION: $20,500 · OtherDORCUS HOPE FOR GIRLS FOUNDATIONSADDLEBACK CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherSADDLEBACK CHURCHLAKE CITY HIGH SCHOOL: $9,500 · Other+16 more: $36,600 · Other+16 moreCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCANOPY VILLAGE I…ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $11,500 · Human ServicesARIZONA'S CHILDR…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR …TESH INC: $4,200 · Human ServicesTESH INCINTERNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE INC: $14,000 · InternationalTHE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $5,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,500 · Health
Other$199,962Human Services$40,200International$14,000Education$8,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $51,862 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTESH INC: $4,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TESH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust?

Find your warmest path to Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support’s filings →

More from the funding graph