· Private foundation
Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust
Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of EVAMARG-MACRUSS-GLO COMMUNITY SUPPORT TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k17 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO | $18,362 |
| DORCUS'S HOPE FOR GIRLS FOUNDATION | $15,500 |
| REAL LIFE MINISTRIES | $12,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| SADDLEBACK CHURCH | $7,500 |
| CHILDERN'S VILLAGE | $7,500 |
| ARIZONA CHILDREN ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CHRISTIAN SC | $5,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE INC | $5,000 |
| ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LAKE CITY HIGH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT | $2,500 |
| MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against -18% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC4× · 2017–2020 · $52k · revenue +22%
- CVCANOPY VILLAGE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +210%
THE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2020 · $8k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- YLYOUNG LIFEone grant, 2019 · $2k
- FCFAITH CHURCH LUTHERANone grant, 2019 · $2k
- KHKOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
It is the mission of Mt. Hood Hospice to provide an independent, community-based program of care for terminally ill patients and their loved ones that emphasizes dignity, comfort and choices for quality of life, regardless of the ability…
We are a team of professionals striving to prepare our patients and families for the end of life experience. we support the patient, family, and friends in facing challenges of a life limiting illness by offering physical, emotional, and…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support and care for the terminally ill, families, and others through all phases of an illness so that they may live as fully and as…
Please see schedule o
Improving health, healing people.
To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.
To fund research to discover cures and more effective treatments for neuroendocrine cancers. the netrf is committed to improving the lives of those affected by neuroendocrine cancer by providing information & educational resources.
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the most unlike its peers is Arizona's Children Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TESH INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust?
Find your warmest path to Evamarg-Macruss-Glo Community Support Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.