Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eunice & Milton H Ring Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$257kPhilanthropy$198kReligion$120kHuman Services$64kEducation$52kArts & Culture$26kInternational$23kHousing & Shelter$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$786k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$26,000
DONEES 1800 OR LESS EACH$17,947
BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE$15,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$8,408
MICHIGAN JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME$7,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT$5,800
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$5,000
INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION$5,000
JACKSON HOLE JEWISH COMMUNITY$3,600
ORT AMERICA$2,500
JCC OF METRO DETROIT$2,500
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$2,440
Individual grant recipient$2,354
YAD EZRA$2,260
FRIENDS OF CAMP MAKE A DREAM-MI$2,160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%BOCA WEST CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BOCA WEST FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%JARC: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$682k · 38 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
19

Total granted

$682k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

37%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEmploymentFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +11%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +69%
  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • TR
    The ROS1ders Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +22% · 26% of their budget
  • UO
    U OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • KO
    KNOW ONCOLOGY ASSOC OF NATURALPATHIC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation of detroit owns, manages and invests jewish communal assets, including general and endowment funds, agency endowments, supporting foundations and real property. the foundation is committed to ensuring that…

Philanthropy
3
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
4
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
5
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
6
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
7
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
8
Jewish Home Services Inc

Jewish senior life of metropolitan detroit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for older adults of the metropolitan detroit jewish community through the provision of personalized high quality programs and services that support…

Human Services
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
11
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
12
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $96,708 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROITJEWISH FEDERATION: $71,770 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONDONEES 1800 OR LESS EACH: $56,883 · OtherDONEES 1800 OR LESS EACHKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $45,000 · OtherKARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTEJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $28,000 · OtherDONEES 1000 OR LESS EACH: $26,704 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,411 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $23,300 · Other+37 more: $208,832 · Other+37 moreThe ROS1ders Inc: $75,000 · HealthThe ROS1ders IncBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $65,000 · HealthBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CA…HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $29,300 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTE…+2 more: $5,500 · HealthHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $10,400 · Arts & CultureINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MICHIGAN JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $2,800 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $17,100 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $7,450 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $9,650 · Community ImprovementSAY DETROIT: $8,200 · Housing & ShelterBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesJARC: $2,100 · Human Services
Other$582,608Health$174,800Arts & Culture$30,700Philanthropy$24,550Community Improvement$9,650Housing & Shelter$8,200Human Services$4,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe ROS1ders Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $29,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $17,340 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $17,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $15,290 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $10,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $9,650 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAY DETROIT: $8,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC: $7,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $7,450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetInsight Community Foundation Inc: $3,600 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $3,580 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCURE MULTIPLE MYELOMA CORPORATION: $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJARC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The ROS1ders Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG ↗
  • Who funds SAY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHIGAN JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Insight Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation CorporationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Harvey and Aileen Kleiman Family Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · Robt & Gail Katz Family Foundation · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Mickey Shapiro Charitable Trust · Grosfeld Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eunice & Milton H Ring Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eunice & Milton H Ring Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eunice & Milton H Ring Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eunice & Milton H Ring Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eunice & Milton H Ring’s filings →

More from the funding graph